Stakes of The Right to Food in the Politics of Transnational Law
Stakes of The Right to Food in the Politics of Transnational Law
复制标题
食物权在跨国法政治中的利害关系
DOI：
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197547410.013.41
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Okano Naoyuki
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
河野正治;菊池真理;オオツキ・グラント・ジュン;河野正治;河野正治;河野正治;河野正治;河野正治;河野正治;河野正治;河野正治;河野正治;河野正治;河野正治;河野正治;河野正治;河野正治;神本秀爾・岡本圭史;神本秀爾・岡本圭史（編）;河野正治;浜田明範（編）;Okano Naoyuki
本章通过食物权实践和斗争的案例研究，探讨跨国法的利害关系、可行性和政治性。本章首先探讨了粮食安全领域跨国法律政治的出现和特殊性，并讨论了地方性的变化意义和新的重要性。然后，介绍了粮食生产的私人监管和粮食主权运动的案例研究，以说明人权政治如何在不同的空间和过程中展开。案例研究表明，虽然跨国法律政治使得政治机构问题难以以令人满意的规范方式解决，但人权有可能为组织和网络不同的斗争场所提供基础。本章认为，在跨国法律政治中，人权应该被视为开放的，可以根据当地的实际斗争来改变其含义和规范内容。
This chapter explores stakes, viabilities, and politics of transnational law through case studies of practices and struggles of the right to food. This chapter first explores the emergence and particularities of transnational legal politics in a field of food security and discusses a changing meaning and renewed importance of locality. Then, case studies of private regulations of food production and food sovereignty movements are presented to illustrate how the politics of human rights unfolds with different spatiality and processes. The case studies illustrate that while transnational legal politics makes a question of political agency difficult to solve in a normatively satisfactory way, human rights have a potential to provide a ground to organize and network different sites of struggles. This chapter submits that, in transnational legal politics, human rights should be seen as being open to shift their meaning and normative contents in response to actual local struggles.