Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST): Results from an International Consensus Conference
Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST): Results from an International Consensus Conference
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/00005373-199903000-00022
复制
发表时间：
1999-03-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Yoshii, H
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Scalea, TM;Rodriguez, A;Yoshii, H
目的：召集一个国际专家小组，就超声检查在创伤护理中的重要应用提出共识建议。会议地点：马里兰州巴尔的摩市马里兰大学医学系统亚当斯考利休克创伤中心。会议于1997年12月4日举行。与会者：由两名联合主任和八名教员组成的委员会，来自外科和急诊医学学科，代表四个国家。每位教师都对目前对美国创伤学的理解做出了重大贡献。结果：六个广泛的主题被认为是有争议的或有广泛的变化在实践中使用特设过程进行了讨论：(1)美国的命名和技术；(2)器官特异性损伤US；(3)美国评分系统；(4)正反美研究的意义；(5)美国资质问题；(6)美国的未来应用。当达成一致意见时，就提出协商一致的建议。对于未解决的问题，提出了多数人的观点和少数人的意见。结论：协商一致的会议进程促进了国际间的思想交流。需要继续交流，以促进美国创伤护理的科学和技术。
Objective: To assemble an international panel of experts to develop consensus recommendations on selected important issues on the use of ultrasonography (US) in trauma care.Setting: R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Md. The conference was held on December 4, 1997,Participants: A committee of two co-directors and eight faculty members, in the disciplines of surgery and emergency medicine, representing four nations. Each faculty member had made significant contributions to the current understanding of US in trauma.Results: Six broad topics felt to be controversial or to have wide variation in practice were discussed using the ad hoc process: (1) US nomenclature and technique; (2) US for organ-specific injury; (3) US scoring systems; (4) the meaning of positive and negative US studies; (5) US credentialing issues; and (6) future applications of US. Consensus recommendations were made when unanimous agreement was reached. Majority viewpoints and minority opinions are presented for unresolved issues.Conclusion: The consensus conference process fostered an international sharing of ideas. Continued communication is needed to advance the science and technology of US in trauma care.