Holomorphic motions of hyperbolic sets
Holomorphic motions of hyperbolic sets
复制标题
双曲集的全纯运动
DOI:
10.1307/mmj/1030132192
复制
发表时间:
1998
影响因子:
0.9
通讯作者:
Mattias Jonsson
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mattias Jonsson
Let M be a complex Hermitian manifold and {fa}a∈D a holomorphic family of endomorphisms of M,whereD is the unit disk. This means that the map D×M → M, defined by(a, x)→ fa(x), is holomorphic. Suppose that f = f0 has a compact surjectively invariant subset K, that is,f(K) = K. For example, K could be a fixed point or a periodic orbit, but also a more complicated set such as the Julia set of a rational function. We may then ask if K is persistent under the perturbationfa of the mapf. For instance, ifK is a fixed point of , then we ask if a has a fixed pointKa nearK for a small enough. A sufficient (albeit not necessary) condition for this is that the fixed point K be hyperbolic, meaning that the derivative of f atK has no eigenvalue of modulus 1. There is a natural notion of hyperbolicity for general sets K. Let us first consider the case when the maps fa are diffeomorphisms. The precise definition (which can be found e.g. in [R]) will not be stated here, but it says that the tangent bundle overK splits continuously into two invariant subbundles on which the derivative of f is expanding and contracting, respectively. One basic result in real dynamics is that hyperbolic sets are persistent under perturbations in the map f (see [R]). In our case this means that if a s small enough, thenfa has a hyperbolic set Ka close toK, and there exists a homeomorphism ha close to the identity conjugating f |K to fa|Ka . If K is a hyperbolic fixed point, then it follows from the implicit function theorem that the fixed point Ka of fa depends holomorphically on a. The natural generalization of this to more general sets K is the notion of a holomorphic motion, the definition of which is given in Section 1.