Torn between state and market: Private policy implementation and conflicting institutional logics*
Torn between state and market: Private policy implementation and conflicting institutional logics*
复制标题
国家与市场之间的撕裂：私人政策的实施与制度逻辑的冲突*
DOI：
10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.12.001
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
9.3
通讯作者：
K. Ingold
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Eva Thomann;E. Lieberherr;K. Ingold
私人行为者的政策实施构成了理解私人治理影响的“缺失环节”。本文提出并评估了一个制度逻辑框架，该框架将自上而下的政策设计方法与自下而上的自由裁量权实施视角相结合。我们认为，国家和市场相互冲突的制度逻辑，加上不同程度的目标模糊性、问责制和混合性，对产出绩效发挥着至关重要的作用。这些论点的分析基于对不同背景下私人和混合政策实施的七个案例研究的二次分析。我们发现，将私人产出绩效与公共利益相结合至少在一定程度上是一个政策设计一致性问题：当国家和市场的逻辑冲突与薄弱的问责机制相结合时，私人执行者往往表现不佳。
Policy implementation by private actors constitutes a “missing link” for understanding the implications of private governance. This paper proposes and assesses an institutional logics framework that combines a top-down, policy design approach with a bottom-up, implementation perspective on discretion. We argue that the conflicting institutional logics of the state and the market, in combination with differing degrees of goal ambiguity, accountability and hybridity play a crucial role for output performance. These arguments are analyzed based on a secondary analysis of seven case studies of private and hybrid policy implementation in diverging contexts. We find that aligning private output performance with public interests is at least partly a question of policy design congruence: private implementing actors tend to perform deficiently when the conflicting logics of the state and the market combine with weak accountability mechanisms.