Comparative Analysis of Archaeological Bronzes

Comparative Analysis of Archaeological Bronzes
复制标题

考古青铜器对比分析

DOI:
10.1021/ba-1974-0138.ch009
复制
发表时间:
1974
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
W. Chase
W. Chase
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. Chase

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

虽然文献中已经报道了成千上万的考古青铜器分析,但比较它们的基础,特别是来自不同实验室的比较,是不可靠的。一项化学分析循环项目试图改善这种情况。两件古代青铜器被磨成细粉,经过筛分,混合成均匀的一团。从这个团块中随机抽取500毫克的样本进行了循环,并从21个实验室返回了结果。分析了48个元素;有些实验室只检测一种元素,有些则多达42种。变异系数(或相对标准偏差)范围从铜的4%到某些微量元素的200%以上。将结果制成表格,并建议在下次运行该程序时缩小结果范围的方法。
While thousands of analyses of archaeological bronzes have been reported in the literature, the basis for comparing them, especially those from different laboratories, is shaky. A round-robin project of chemical analyses was attempted to improve the situation. Two ancient bronze objects were milled to a fine powder, sieved, and mixed to a homogeneous mass. Samples of 500 mg each drawn randomly from this mass were circulated, and results were returned from 21 laboratories. Forty-eight elements were analyzed; some laboratories did only one element, some did as many as 42. The coefficient of variance (or relative standard deviation) ranges from 4% for Cu up to over 200% for some trace elements. The results are tabulated, and methods are suggested to narrow the spread of results in the next run of this program.