Evaluation of sorbent materials
Evaluation of sorbent materials
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1989
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
W. Rankin;S. Gomillion;R. Luckenbach
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Rankin;S. Gomillion;R. Luckenbach
在严格控制的实验室条件下，测定了不同类型液体吸附材料的吸附效率。结果表明，材料的吸附容量既受材料类型的影响，又受材料形态的影响。有吸引力的替代吸着剂原子擦拭‘’和油干被确定。碎状合成吸附剂制成的小枕头是油干吸附剂和原子湿巾的诱人替代品，既是吸附剂，也是擦拭去污的替代品。布状的合成吸着剂在通过擦拭去污方面提供了一种比原子擦拭更有吸引力的替代品，因为这些材料与硝酸兼容，而且它们可能更耐火。计划对最有前景的脱硫剂进行更大规模的评估。此外，还计划开发一种高效、与硝酸兼容、耐火的吸附剂。参考文献6，表2。
The sorption efficiency of different types of liquid sorbent materials was determined under carefully controlled laboratory conditions. Results show that the sorption capacity is affected both by the type of material and by the form of the material. Attractive alternate sorbents to atomic wipes'' and Oil-Dry were identified. Small pillows of shredded synthetic sorbents are an attractive alternative to Oil-Dry as a sorbent and to atomic wipes'' as both a sorbent and in decontamination by wiping. Synthetic sorbents in cloth form offer an attractive alternative to atomic wipes'' in decontamination by wiping because theses materials are compatible with nitric acid and they may be more fire resistant. A larger-scale evaluation is planned with the most promising sorbents. In addition, development is planned of a sorbent that will be efficient, compatible with nitric acid, fire resistant. 6 refs., 2 tabs.