Sousveillance, Media and Strategic Political Communication, by Vian Bakir
Sousveillance, Media and Strategic Political Communication, by Vian Bakir
复制标题
Sousveillance，媒体和战略政治传播，作者：Vian Bakir
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
W. Miller
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Miller
此外，我不相信科恩为我们提供了一个“总统领导的新理论”。2，12），因为他声称在介绍章节。科恩指出，导致总统“上市”方式转变的两个主要背景因素，即日益分散的媒体和两极分化的政党，也是Kernell（2007）认为导致传统“上市”战略日益无效的因素。因此，科恩试图在本书中建立的理论与其说是新的，不如说是对科内尔（2007）关于总统领导力的公开理论的更新。这并不意味着一个更详细的“更新”的总统领导理论的种子没有播下，也没有这种评价减少了一个事实，即这本书是一个有价值的和急需的贡献正在进行的辩论如何以及何时总统沟通策略的重要性。
In addition, I am not convinced that Cohen has offered us a “new theory of presidential leadership” (pp. 2, 12) as he claims in the introductory chapters. The two primary contextual factors Cohen points to as leading to shifts in the way presidents “go public,” an increasingly fragmented media and polarized parties, are also the factors Kernell (2007) names as contributing to the increasing ineffectiveness of traditional “going public” strategies. Thus, the theory Cohen attempts to build in this book is not so much new as an update of Kernell’s (2007) going public theory of presidential leadership. This does not mean that the seeds for a more elaborate “newer” theory of presidential leadership are not sown, nor does this evaluation diminish the fact that the book is a valuable and much-needed contribution to the ongoing debate about how and when presidential communication strategies matter.