The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11: reassessment of its structure in a community sample.

The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11: reassessment of its structure in a community sample.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/a0032161
复制
发表时间:
2013-06
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
London, Edythe D.
London, Edythe D.
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Reise, Steven P.;Moore, Tyler M.;Sabb, Fred W.;Brown, Amira K.;London, Edythe D.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

Barratt冲动量表第11版(BIS-11)是一个黄金标准的测量方法,在塑造当前冲动控制理论方面具有影响力,并在冲动及其生物学,心理学和行为相关性的研究中发挥了关键作用。然而,对BIS-11结构的心理测量学研究却很少。因此,我们应用探索性和验证性因素分析,收集的数据使用BIS-11在社区样本(N = 691)。我们的目标是测试BIS-11结构的四种理论:(a)一维模型;(B)六个相关的一阶因子模型;(c)三个二阶因子模型;(d)双因子模型。发现的问题包括:(a)某些项目与其他项目的相关性低或接近零;(B)大量项目对的内容高度冗余;(c)在多维解决方案中具有显著交叉负荷的项目;以及最终;(d)与验证模型的拟合度差。我们的结论是,使用BIS-11总分反映冲动的一个共同的维度上的个体差异提出了解释的挑战。此外,BIS-11测量冲动性的三个子域(注意力、运动和非计划性)的理论没有得到经验支持。一个双因素模型提供了一个替代的多维结构表示。
The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Version 11 (BIS-11) is a gold-standard measure that has been influential in shaping current theories of impulse control, and has played a key role in studies of impulsivity and its biological, psychological, and behavioral correlates. Psychometric research on the structure of the BIS-11, however, has been scant. We therefore applied exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to data collected using the BIS-11 in a community sample (N = 691). Our goal was to test four theories of the BIS-11 structure: (a) a unidimensional model; (b) a six correlated first-order factor model, (c) a three second-order factor model, and (d) a bifactor model. Among the problems identified were: (a) low or near-zero correlations of some items with others; (b) highly redundant content of numerous item pairs; (c) items with salient cross-loadings in multidimensional solutions; and ultimately; (d) poor fit to confirmatory models. We conclude that use of the BIS-11 total score as reflecting individual differences on a common dimension of impulsivity presents challenges in interpretation. Also, the theory that the BIS-11 measures three subdomains of impulsivity (attention, motor, and non-planning) was not empirically supported. A two-factor model is offered as an alternative multidimensional structural representation.
DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
发表时间: 1999-01-01
影响因子: 6
作者:
Hu, Li-tze;Bentler, Peter M.
通讯作者: Bentler, Peter M.
DOI: 10.1080/00223890701629730
发表时间: 2007-12-01
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Gignac, Gilles E.;Palmer, Benjamin R.;Stough, Con
通讯作者: Stough, Con
DOI: 10.1037/a0022301
发表时间: 2011-06-01
影响因子: 3.6
作者:
Schalet, Benjamin D.;Durbin, C. Emily;Revelle, William
通讯作者: Revelle, William
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477
发表时间: 2010-11
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Reise SP;Moore TM;Haviland MG
通讯作者: Haviland MG
DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1401_4
发表时间: 1979-01-01
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
REVELLE, W
通讯作者: REVELLE, W