UBIQUITOUS EXSOLUTION OF PENTLANDITE AND TROILITE IN PYRRHOTITE FROM THE TIL 91722 CM2 CARBONACEOUS CHONDRITE: A RECORD OF LOW TEMPERATURE SOLID STATE
UBIQUITOUS EXSOLUTION OF PENTLANDITE AND TROILITE IN PYRRHOTITE FROM THE TIL 91722 CM2 CARBONACEOUS CHONDRITE: A RECORD OF LOW TEMPERATURE SOLID STATE
复制标题
TIL 91722 CM2 碳质球粒陨石中镍黄铁矿和硫铁矿在磁黄铁矿中的普遍溶出:低温固态记录
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
C. Martínez
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Brearley;C. Martínez
Introduction: CM chondrites are a remarkably diverse group of meteorites whose early solar system record is among the most complex of all the meteorite groups. The recognition that these meteorites exhibit variable degrees of aqueous alteration has led to considerable efforts to develop indicators of the extent of aqueous alteration [1-4]. A key component of understanding the evolution of CM chondrites during aqueous alteration is addressing the issue of how different elements may be mobilized and redistributed by aqueous fluids. Sulfur plays a central role in this process, because it is present in a wide range of minerals in CM chondrites, including tochilinite, sulfides and sulfates. Sulfides have been the focus of considerable interest [5-7], and it has been recognized that the key mineral phases that are present are pentlandite and pyrrhotite [5-9]. The relationships between these phases and their origins still remain poorly understood, however. Here we present new SEM and TEM observations of sulfides from a CM that provide additional insights into the origin of these grains. Techniques: A thin section of the CM chondrite TIL 91722 was studied with SE and BSE imaging using a FEI Quanta 3D FEGSEM. Qualitative EDS spectra were obtained from individual grains on a JEOL 5200LV SEM. TEM sections from individual sulfide grains were prepared using a FEI Quanta 3D DualBeam® FEGSEM/FIB. FIB-prepared samples were removed from the thin sections using the in situ lift out technique with an Omniprobe 200 micromanipulator. Results: We studied 20 pyrrhotite grains from TIL 91722, ranging in size from 30 to 60 μm. Two different occurrences were identified: 1) aggregates of pyrrhotite and pentlandite consisting of numerous individual grains of both phases and 2) more common, well-crystallized grains of pyrrhotite that are usually composites of pyrrhotite and pentlandite. Pyrrhotite is volumetrically the most abundant phase in these grains. Pentlandite usually occurs as irregular-shaped grains up to 20 μm in size along the periphery of the pyrrhotite crystals. Elongate, subrounded pentlandite also occurs in the interior of some pyrrhotite grains. These occurrences are typical of pyrrhotite in other CM chondrites, e.g. [5-9]. None of the pyrrhotite grains in TIL 91722 show any evidence of alteration. FEGSEM studies show that in every pyrrhotite grain studied, submicron exsolution of pentlandite is evident (Figure 1). The pentlandite occurs as both crystallographically-oriented lamellae up to 6 μm in length and <0.1 μm wide and as elongate blebs that are typically <0.2 μm long and <0.1 μm wide. Exsolution of pentlandite has been documented in pyrrhotite in CM chondrites [7-9], but the widespread occurrence of this phenomenon has not been generally recognized. In addition to inclusions of pentlandite, the pyrrhotite grains also contain irregular domains which show lower BSE contrast than the pyrrhotite host (Fig 2). These domains have a sinusoidal or flame-like texture and occur on the scale of a few 100s of nanometers. They appear to be distributed throughout pyrrhotite grains and are present in all the coarse-grained single crystals that were studied. TEM observations of a FIB sample removed from a pyrrhotite grain reveal a complex microstructure Elongate, exsolved pentlandite blebs ranging from ~0.5 μm down to <0.1 μm are distributed throughout the pyrrhotite. AEM analyses show that the pentlandite is Co-bearing. Although essentially invisible in conventional TEM images, DF STEM Z-contrast images show that the grain exhibits a remarkable flame-like microstructure (Figure 3) consisting of lamellae of a more Fe-rich sulfide intergrown with a lower Z phase. Electron diffraction patterns from this intergrowth show that the dominant (lower Z) phase is monoclinic pyrrhotite intergrown with hexagonal troilite.