REGULATION OF APOLIPOPROTEIN-E GENE-EXPRESSION AFTER INJURY OF THE RAT SCIATIC-NERVE
REGULATION OF APOLIPOPROTEIN-E GENE-EXPRESSION AFTER INJURY OF THE RAT SCIATIC-NERVE
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/jnr.490250203
复制
发表时间:
1990-02-01
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
PODUSLO, JF
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
LEBLANC, AC;PODUSLO, JF
The expression of apolipoprotein E (apo E) is dramatically increased following peripheral nerve injury. This increased expression has been postulated to be negatively influenced by unknown mechanisms during subsequent axonal regeneration (Muller et al.: Science 228:499-501, 1985). The present study investigates the role of the regenerating axon in regulating apo E gene expression in two experimental paradigms which permit or prevent axonal regeneration in the adult rat sciatic nerve-the crush or permanent transection injuries. The nerves in these two models undergo axonal degeneration, demyelination, and Schwann cell proliferation; however, subsequent axonal regeneration and remyelination occur only in the distal segment of the crush-injured and not in the permanently transected nerve. The steady-state levels of apo E mRNA in both models increase sharply between 1 and 4 days and reach a maximum level at 12-14 days, which did not change significantly between 14 and 35 days after injury. No significant difference is observed in the steady-state levels of apo E mRNA between the crushed and permanently transected nerves as a function of time after injury. The steady-state protein level of apo E in the endoneurial segments initially increases, peaks at 14-21 days, and then decreases between 35 and 60 days after injury in both models. In contrast, the rate of newly translated and secreted apo E significantly increases by fourfold (P < 0.005) between 35 and 60 days after permanent transection whereas it does not significantly differ at these times after crush injury. The increased rate of translation and secretion of apo E after transection compared to the constant rate observed after crush injury, together with the comparable steady-state levels of apo E mRNA and protein in both models, suggests translational or post-translational control, but not transcriptional and/or posttranscriptional control, by the regenerating axons. Furthermore, the increasing rate of biosynthesis and secretion of apo E after permanent transection concomitant with the decreasing steady-state levels of the protein suggests that apo E is either removed from the endoneurium or subsequently utilized or degraded by mechanisms that are independent from nerve regeneration.