Determination of effective air-water interfacial area in partially saturated porous media using surfactant adsorption

Determination of effective air-water interfacial area in partially saturated porous media using surfactant adsorption
复制标题

DOI:
10.1029/97wr02227
复制
发表时间:
1997-12-01
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
Annable, MD
Annable, MD
中科院分区:
地球科学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kim, H;Rao, PSC;Annable, MD

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

使用表面反应性示踪剂(十二烷基苯磺酸钠 (SDBS))和非反应性示踪剂(溴化物)在多个水饱和度 (S-W) 下测量砂填充柱中的有效比空气-水界面面积((a) 高于 bar(i))。在稳定水流条件下进行混相驱替实验,以量化 SDBS 由于吸附在砂填充柱中的空气-水界面上而产生的延迟。随着 S-W 的降低,观察到与非反应性示踪剂溴化物相比,SDBS 的延迟增加的一致趋势。使用吉布斯模型解释在不同 SDBS 浓度下测量的空气-水表面张力数据,以估计所需的吸附参数。然后将 SDBS 穿透曲线的延迟因子 (R-t) 与估计的 SDBS 吸附系数结合使用,计算不同 S-W 下的 (a) over bar(i) 值。对于本研究中采用的实验条件范围,SDBS 的延迟因子范围从 S-W = 1.00 时的 R-t = 1.07(由于 SDBS 吸附在沙子上,R-t > 1)到 S-W = 0.29 时的 R-t = 3.44(对应于 (a) 超过 bar(i) = 46 cm(2)/cm(3))。这些值与理论预测和最近发布的数据一致。还讨论了克服所提出方法的实验限制所需的改进。
The effective specific air-water interfacial area ((a) over bar(i)) in a sand-packed column was measured at several water saturations (S-W) using a surface-reactive tracer (sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS)) and a nonreactive tracer (bromide). Miscible displacement experiments were conducted under steady water flow conditions to quantify the retardation of SDBS resulting from its adsorption onto the air-water interface in a sand-packed column. A consistent trend of increased retardation of SDBS compared with the nonreactive tracer, bromide, was observed with decreasing S-W. The data for air-water surface tension measured at various SDBS concentrations were interpreted using the Gibbs model to estimate the required adsorption parameters. The retardation factors (R-t) for SDBS breakthrough curves were then used in combination with the estimated SDBS adsorption coefficient to calculate the (a) over bar(i) values at different S-W. For the range of experimental conditions employed in this study, the retardation factor for SDBS ranged from R-t = 1.07 at S-W = 1.00 (R-t > 1 due to SDBS sorption on sand) to R-t = 3.44 at S-W = 0.29 (which corresponds to (a) over bar(i) = 46 cm(2)/cm(3)). These values are in agreement with theoretical predictions and recently published data. Improvements needed to overcome the experimental limitations of the presented method are also discussed.