Exploring the Utility
Exploring the Utility
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Hunter;Kieran J. Dyer;Robert A. Cribbie;J. Eastwood
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Hunter;Kieran J. Dyer;Robert A. Cribbie;J. Eastwood
9抽象。背景：状态无聊——当下的无聊体验——与许多社会心理问题有关。直到最近多维状态无聊量表（MSBS）问世之前，研究一直受到缺乏全面、有效测量方法的限制。然而，MSBS可以从进一步的评估中受益。目的：更彻底地验证MSBS。方法：在两项研究中，12名被试分别被诱导进入无聊状态和非无聊状态，然后完成问卷调查。结果：判别分析13表明，完整的MSBS能够正确地将68.1%（研究2）- 84.1%（研究1）的参与者分类到他们的实验状态。基于14个进一步的数据分析，提出了一个包含8个项目的子集（一个潜在的简短形式）。差异项目功能（研究1）发现只有1到15个项目的反应因性别而异。讨论：讨论了MSBS的使用，包括完整尺寸和简短形式。无聊的哪16个经验成分可能对分类无聊的个体特别重要，以及无聊操作的可变性问题，也被考虑在内。
9 Abstract. Background : State boredom–the experience of boredom in the moment – is related to a number of psychosocial issues. Until the 10 recent creation of the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale (MSBS), research was constrained by the lack of a comprehensive, validated 11 measure. However, the MSBS could benefit from further evaluation. Aim : To more thoroughly validate the MSBS. Methods : In two studies, 12 participants were induced into a state of either boredom or non-boredom, and then completed the MSBS. Results : Discriminant analysis showed 13 that the full MSBS was able to correctly classify 68.1% (Study 2) – 84.1% (Study 1) of participants into their experimental condition. Based on 14 further DA analysis, a subset of eight items (a potential short form) is proposed. Differential item functioning (Study 1) found only one item to 15 which responding differed by gender. Discussion : Use of the MSBS, including the full scale versus the short form, is discussed. Which 16 experiential components of boredom may be particularly important for classifying bored individuals, and the issue of variability across boredom 17 manipulations, are also considered.