Volunteer monitoring of E. coli in streams of the upper Midwestern United States: a comparison of methods
Volunteer monitoring of E. coli in streams of the upper Midwestern United States: a comparison of methods
复制标题
美国中西部上游溪流中大肠杆菌的志愿者监测:方法比较
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Timothy S. Grant
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kristine F. Stepenuck;L. Wolfson;Barbara W. Liukkonen;J. Iles;Timothy S. Grant
Fecal contamination of water is a public health concern for those using the water for drinking or recreation. The EPA recommends using Escherichia coli to evaluate recreational freshwaters for fecal contamination. With limited resources available, states have recently focused on training volunteers to expand data collection and resource assessment. Several bacteria testing methods are available for use by the public; however, few studies have comprehensively evaluated their use by volunteers. This study evaluated two E. coli monitoring methods used by volunteers: Coliscan Easygel® and 3MTM PetrifilmTM, incubated for 24 and 48 hours. The methods were assessed to determine how closely each matched results with EPA-approved laboratory analyses. Analysis of covariance results indicated that when used by volunteers to monitor surface water, 3MTM PetrifilmTM results were more similar to laboratory analyses than Coliscan Easygel®. Both test methods had similar overall accuracy of predicting if a sample exceeded or fell below the 235 cfu/100 mL EPA body contact standard for recreational surface waters. Two-thirds of volunteers preferred 3MTM PetrifilmTM.
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
Vail,JH;Morgan,R;Merino,CR;Gonzales,F;Miller,R;Ram,JL
通讯作者:
Ram,JL