Why do you shop there? A mixed methods study mapping household food shopping patterns onto weekly routines of black women.
Why do you shop there? A mixed methods study mapping household food shopping patterns onto weekly routines of black women.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s12966-016-0333-6
复制
发表时间：
2016-01-28
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kumanyika S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DiSantis KI;Hillier A;Holaday R;Kumanyika S
增加健康食品获取机会的举措的有效性可能会受到人们决定在哪里购物的影响。那些在附近没有大型杂货店的人会发展出需要去其他地区购物的购物模式，而一些在附近有购物通道的人也会去其他地方购物。我们试图了解黑人妇女的家庭食品购物模式，了解她们在哪里购物以及为什么购物。35名低收入或中等收入/高收入黑人母亲或至少有一个孩子的照顾者的所有食品购物旅行都是从连续四周收集的杂货店购物收据中确定的。食品购物地点与参与者的家和他们在每周例行旅行中访问的其他地方（例如，工作，孩子的学校）的位置一起绘制沿着。半结构化的个人访谈引出了关于杂货店购物旅行是否以及如何与日常旅行联系在一起的叙述性信息。归纳内容分析被用来确定紧急主题的采访。对与地理空间距离和通过绘制参与者购物地图确定的旅行模式有关的主题进行了审议。参与者平均在六家不同的商店购物，在四周内平均旅行35英里（标准差= 41）（欧几里德距离）。最常光顾的商店是在一英里以内的家（57%）或家或其他地方访问的每周例行约77%的参与者。访谈结果强调了便利性的概念，这是指地理位置接近家庭或日常目的地，也有可能节省时间，因为几个商店位于同一地点，或因为商店布局易于浏览和熟悉。商店的选择还与运输方式、价格和家庭对某些食物的偏好有关。人们总是在他们居住的社区以外的地方购物，这是有原因的。在食品环境干预措施中考虑到邻近性以外的因素（例如，购物时节省时间，促销不太熟悉的食品，定价），可能会促进社区居民使用新商店，从而增加这些商店作为促进健康的食品环境干预措施的可行性。
The effectiveness of initiatives to increase healthy food access may be affected by where people decide to shop. People with poor neighborhood access to large grocery stores develop shopping patterns that require traveling to other areas, and some people who do have neighborhood access also travel elsewhere for food shopping. We sought to gain an understanding of household food shopping patterns in a sample of Black women in terms of where they shopped and why. All food shopping trips of 35 low- or middle/high-income black mothers or caregivers living with at least one child were identified from grocery shopping receipts collected over four consecutive weeks. Food shopping locations were mapped along with locations of participants’ homes and other places they visited during weekly routine travels (e.g. work, child’s school). Semi-structured individual interviews elicited narrative information about whether and how grocery shopping trips were linked to routine travels. Inductive content analysis was utilized to identify emergent themes from interviews. Themes were considered in relation to geospatial distances and travel patterns identified through mapping of participants’ shopping. Participants shopped at an average of six different stores, traveling on average a total of 35 miles (sd = 41) (Euclidian distance) over the four weeks. The most frequented store was within a mile of home (57 %) or home or another place visited in the weekly routine for about 77 % of participants. Interview results emphasized the concept of convenience which referred to geographical proximity to the home or routine destinations and also to potential to save time because several stores were co-located or because the store layout was easy to navigate and familiar. Store selection also related to mode of transportation, pricing, and family preference for certain foods. People have specific reasons for consistently shopping in areas outside of their neighborhood of residence. Incorporating considerations other than proximity (e.g. time saving while shopping, promoting less familiar foods, pricing) into food environment interventions may facilitate use of new stores by neighborhood residents and thereby increase the viability of these stores as health-promoting food environment interventions.