Venuti's Visibility

Venuti's Visibility
复制标题

韦努蒂的能见度

DOI:
10.1075/target.8.1.12pym
复制
发表时间:
1996
影响因子:
1
通讯作者:
A. Pym
A. Pym
中科院分区:
人文科学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Pym

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

序言(2010年):以下是Target 8/2(1996年)发表的文章的略有修订版本,第100页。165-177,原分页用方括号表示。现在,在2010年重新审视这段文字,我有点惊讶地注意到它被解读为过于“讽刺”的程度(Munday 2001:155),仅仅是为了好玩而取笑。当时,在1995-96年,我真诚地感谢韦努蒂的工作,因为它使知识空间合法化:我希望我文章的最后一句话比开头的话更有分量。韦努蒂比当时那些技术官僚式的准科学家要迷人得多。我当然不是想在任何意义上的讽刺-如果我有,我会有一个外地天与韦努蒂的决定性复古的三重实质性的标题,和类似的-我是认真地试图提出几点关于翻译的社会学。但是我们无法控制我们被阅读的方式;读者看到的是开始而不是结束。这就是这段文字,或多或少。
Prefatory note (2010): The following is a slightly revised version of the article published in Target 8/2 (1996), pp. 165-177, with the original page breaks indicated in square brackets. Revisiting the text now, in 2010, I am a little surprised to note the extent to which it was read as being overly “sarcastic” (Munday 2001: 155), as poking fun merely for the sake of fun. At the time, in 1995-96, I sincerely appreciated Venuti’s work for the intellectual space it legitimized: I would have hoped that the last sentence of my article would carry significantly more weight than the opening gambit. Venuti was a lot more engaging than the technocratic would-be scientists of the day. I was certainly not trying to be sarcastic in any gratuitous sense – if I had, I would have had a field-day with Venuti’s decidedly retro triple-substantive titles, and the like – and I was seriously trying to make a few points about the sociology of translation. But we are not able to control the way we are read; readers see more beginnings than ends. So here is the text, more or less as it was.