Cognitive assessment of social anxiety: a comparison of self-report and thought listing methods.

Cognitive assessment of social anxiety: a comparison of self-report and thought listing methods.
复制标题

社交焦虑的认知评估:自我报告和思想列表方法的比较。

DOI:
10.1080/16506070410030106
复制
发表时间:
2005
期刊:
Cognitive behaviour therapy.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hofmann,StefanG
Hofmann,StefanG
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Heinrichs,Nina;Hofmann,StefanG

文献摘要

相似文献

本研究的目标是比较两种社交焦虑的认知评估方法:想法列表和自我报告方法。本研究的重点是使用多特征多方法方法对这些方法的收敛和发散有效性进行研究。此外,还探讨了治疗敏感性。58例社交恐惧症患者在暴露组治疗前后(n= 33)或等待期后(n= 25)完成了思维列表,随后完成了2项不同的社交压力任务。  一个任务包括在2个同盟者面前说话,而另一个任务涉及与异性同盟者开始对话。还完成了两份关于公众演讲和社交互动的积极和消极自我陈述的问卷。为了比较积极和消极思想的平衡,计算了两种认知评估方法的精神状态比率[积极思想/(积极+消极思想)]。结果表明,与社交焦虑相关的方法比与公开演讲焦虑相关的方法表现出更好的收敛效度;然而,公开演讲方法比与社交焦虑相关的方法更好地捕获治疗效果。本研究质疑了不同认知评估方法测量相同结构的常见假设。
The goal of the present study was to compare 2 cognitive assessment methods for social anxiety: a thought listing and a self‐report method. The focus of this study was on the convergent and divergent validity of these methods using a multi‐trait multi‐method approach. Furthermore, treatment sensitivity was explored. Fifty‐eight patients with social phobia completed thought listings followed by 2 different social stress tasks before and after an exposure group treatment (n= 33), or following a waiting period (n= 25). One task consisted of speaking in front of 2 confederates while the other task involved initiating a conversation with an opposite‐sex confederate. Two questionnaires measuring positive and negative self‐statements regarding public speaking and social interactions were also completed. To compare the balance of positive and negative thoughts, the State of Mind ratio [positive thoughts/(positive+negative thoughts)] was calculated for both cognitive assessment methods. Results demonstrate that methods related to social interaction anxiety showed better convergent validity than methods related to public speaking anxiety; however, public speaking methods captured treatment effects better than methods related to social interaction anxiety. This study questions the common assumption that different cognitive assessment methods measure the same construct.