ASEAN during the life of The Pacific Review: a balance sheet on regional governance and community building
ASEAN during the life of The Pacific Review: a balance sheet on regional governance and community building
复制标题
《太平洋评论》时期的东盟：关于区域治理和社区建设的资产负债表
DOI：
10.1080/09512748.2017.1304436
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Helen E. S. Nesadurai
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Helen E. S. Nesadurai
摘要 最近对东盟的研究集中于为什么东盟共同体建设强调人权、民主促进和对更广泛参与的承诺等自由主义规范，同时维持一套维护主权的区域原则——东盟方式规范——这些原则更适合确保非自由议程和国家精英的独裁实践。有人认为，东盟看似进步的转变有助于巩固该组织作为国际社会中可信区域机构的合法性，这些规范在国际社会中得到了广泛接受，但并非没有争议。最近的事态发展表明，整个地区的独裁倾向进一步巩固或回归，以国家为基础的治理模式在东盟成员国准备支持的方面可能会变得更加有限。因此，学者们现在应该扩大分析，探索如何在非国家行为体发挥关键作用的正式区域机构之外对跨国问题进行功能性治理。尽管在全球治理中转向私人制定的标准、规则和实践已得到广泛认可和研究，但有关东南亚私人治理的不同研究很少汇总成一个更连贯的研究计划，以解决私人治理的有效性及其规范含义。这些问题为东南亚区域和其他跨国治理模式的研究指明了一个充满希望的议程。
ABSTRACT Recent studies of ASEAN have focused on why ASEAN community building has emphasised liberal norms such as human rights, democracy promotion and a commitment to wider participation while maintaining a set of sovereignty-preserving regional principles – the ASEAN Way norms – that have been more suited to securing illiberal agendas and the authoritarian practices of state elites. ASEAN's seeming progressive turn is argued to be instrumentally aimed at buttressing the legitimacy of the grouping as a credible regional institution in international society in which these norms are widely accepted though not uncontested. With recent developments suggesting further consolidation of, or a return to, authoritarian tendencies across the region, state-based modes of governance may become more limited in terms of what ASEAN member states are prepared to endorse. It is, therefore, time for scholars to expand analysis to explore how transnational issues and problems may be functionally governed outside of formal regional institutions involving non-state actors in key roles. While the turn to privately generated standards, rules and practices in global governance is well-recognised and researched, the disparate studies on private governance in South-East Asia are rarely cumulated into a more coherent research programme that addresses the effectiveness of private governance as well as its normative implications. These questions point to a promising agenda for research on regional and other transnational modes of governance in South-East Asia.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Prantl, Jochen
通讯作者：
Prantl, Jochen