RELATIONAL AGGRESSION - THE ROLE OF INTENT ATTRIBUTIONS, FEELINGS OF DISTRESS, AND PROVOCATION TYPE
RELATIONAL AGGRESSION - THE ROLE OF INTENT ATTRIBUTIONS, FEELINGS OF DISTRESS, AND PROVOCATION TYPE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/s0954579400006520
复制
发表时间：
1995-03-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
CRICK, NR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
CRICK, NR
在最近的研究中，已经确定了一种关系导向的攻击形式，与通过物理手段伤害他人的公开攻击相反（例如，打人），通过损害同伴关系来伤害他人（例如，愤怒地报复同龄人，把她排除在自己的游戏小组之外）。本研究的目的是评估意图归因、苦恼感和挑衅类型（关系型与工具型）在儿童关系攻击行为中的作用。共有252名三年级至六年级的儿童作为受试者参加。一个假设的挑衅工具被用来评估儿童的意图归因和痛苦的感觉模糊的关系和工具性挑衅的情况。结果表明，作为假设，关系攻击性儿童表现出敌意归因偏见，并报告显着更高的水平的困扰比他们的非攻击性同龄人的关系挑衅的情况。此外，女孩比男孩的关系挑衅的情况下，显着更高的水平的困扰。此外，一个共病组的关系加上公开的侵略性儿童也表现出敌意归因偏见，然而，他们的偏见是明显的工具挑衅的情况下。
In recent research a relationally oriented form of aggression has been identified that, in contrast to overt aggression that harms others through physical means (e.g., hitting), harms others through damage to their peer relationships (e.g., angrily retaliating against a peer by excluding her from one's play group). The goal of this research was to assess the role of intent attributions, feelings of distress, and provocation type (relational vs. instrumental) in children's relationally aggressive behavior. A total of 252 third- through sixth-grade children participated as subjects. A hypothetical provocation instrument was used to assess children's intent attributions and feelings of distress for ambiguous relational and instrumental provocation situations. Results showed that, as hypothesized, relationally aggressive children exhibited a hostile attributional bias and reported significantly higher levels of distress than did their nonaggressive peers for relational provocation situations. In addition, girls reported significantly higher levels of distress than did boys for relational provocation situations. Further, a comorbid group of relationally plus overtly aggressive children also exhibited a hostile attributional bias; however, their bias was evident for instrumental provocation situations only.