Work Flow and Material Standards
Work Flow and Material Standards
复制标题
工作流程和材料标准
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-030-17490-3_5
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Peddie
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Peddie
虽然基本的光线追踪算法相对简单，但生成高质量光线追踪图像的支持组件是强大的。允许图像花多长时间来解决带来了所需或可接受的准确度和保真度的问题。如果渲染在完全解决之前停止，一些从业者说这样的妥协会导致有偏见的图像。必须考虑库、API、着色语言和颜色等标准。以及最后，显示光线跟踪结果的显示和/或打印设备的质量。为了创建一个开放的工作流程和可互换的文件，公司已经提出了开放材料库和标准文件格式的想法。在这方面已经取得了进展，但也有一些专有的外观，这代表了重要的产品差异化，公司将永远不会分享。
Although the basic ray racing algorithm is relatively straight forward, the supporting components to produce a high-quality ray traced image are formidable. How long an image is allowed to take to resolve brings into question the degree of accuracy and fidelity desired, or acceptable. If a rendering is halted before it is fully resolved, some practitioners says such a compromise results in a biased image. Standards in libraries, APIs, shading languages and colors to mention a few have to be taken into consideration. And finally, the quality of the display and/or printing device to show the ray traced results. In an attempt to create an open workflow and interchangeable files companies have promoted the idea of an open materials library and a standard file format. Progress has been made in that effort, but there are certain proprietary looks, that represent important product differentiation that companies will never share.