Correcting 'a notional' confusion for critical discourse analysis
Correcting 'a notional' confusion for critical discourse analysis
复制标题
纠正批判性话语分析的“概念性”混乱
DOI：
10.1080/14767430.2022.2105617
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Walker R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Walker R
在Bhaskar死后出版的《启蒙常识》（Enlightened Common Sense，2016年）中，批评性话语分析（CDA）图式中“一个概念”的含义和语法地位有些模糊。在模式的后续开发中一直存在的歧义。在Bhaskar的原始手稿出版后，现在可以看到在出版过程中对手稿进行了错误的语法修改。原始版本为CDA提供了一个更一致的模式。本文讨论了原始版本曝光的影响。这表明Bhaskar为CDA创建了一个比出版版本更连贯的模式。澄清Bhaskar的批评性话语分析图式中的“一个概念”的意义和语法地位以及随后从它衍生出来的一个图式是对未来批判现实主义批评话语分析的一个重要纠正。
The meaning and grammatical status of ‘a notional’ in the schema for critical discourse analysis (CDA) from Bhaskar’s posthumously published Enlightened Common Sense (2016) is somewhat ambiguous. An ambiguity that has persisted through a subsequent development of the schema. Following the publication of Bhaskar’s original manuscript, it can now be seen that erroneous grammatical changes were made to the manuscript during the publication process. The original version provides a more coherent schema for CDA. This paper discusses the implications of the original version coming to light. This shows that Bhaskar created a more coherent schema for CDA than the published version indicated. Clarifying the meaning and grammatical status of ‘a notional’ in Bhaskar’s schema for CDA and a schema that was subsequently derived from it is an important corrective for future critical realist critical discourse analysts.