Who's who: How “women of color” are (or are not) represented in STEM education research
Who's who: How “women of color” are (or are not) represented in STEM education research
复制标题
名人录：STEM 教育研究中“有色人种女性”的代表（或不代表）
DOI：
10.1002/sce.21694
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Terrell R. Morton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Miles;Charlotte A. Agger;R. Roby;Terrell R. Morton
尽管国家呼吁在科学、技术、工程和数学（STEM）领域增加多样性和包容性，但不公平的招聘和留住战略仍然司空见惯。许多策略的本质是缺乏具体性，无法满足那些在种族、性别和阶级交叉点上被少数化的个人的需求、愿望和文化，而这些人是通过使用广泛的、全面的分类，如“有色人种妇女”。使用关键的种族女权主义，我们从事最近的同行评审，经验STEM教育文章的Meta合成，使用术语“有色人种女性”来确定（a）术语“有色人种女性”是如何定义的，（B）谁是和不是由这个术语代表的，（c）以及研究结果如何解释WOC的存在。我们提供了如何使用术语的关键讨论，并呼吁在公平和公正的STEM编程的特异性。
Despite national calls for increasing diversity and inclusion within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), inequitable recruitment and retention strategies remain commonplace. Inherent to many strategies is a lack of specificity in attending to the needs, desires, and cultures of individuals who are minoritized at the intersections of race, gender, and class through the use of broad, sweeping classifications such as “Women of Color.” Using critical race feminism, we engaged in a meta‐synthesis of recent peer‐reviewed, empirical STEM education articles that used the term “Women of Color” to identify (a) how the term “Women of Color” was defined, (b) who was and was not represented by this term and (c) and how research findings accounted for the presence of WOC. We provide a critical discussion of how terminology is used and a call for specificity in equitable and justice‐oriented STEM programming.
影响因子：
4
作者：
Egan, SK;Perry, DG
通讯作者：
Perry, DG