The Professional Knowledge of German Secondary Mathematics Teachers: Investigations in the Context of the COACTIV Project
The Professional Knowledge of German Secondary Mathematics Teachers: Investigations in the Context of the COACTIV Project
复制标题
德国中学数学教师的专业知识:COACTIV项目背景下的调查
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Baumert
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Krauss;M. Neubrand;W. Blum;J. Baumert
The relevance of teachers’ domain-specific knowledge for high-quality instruction has been emphasised repeatedly, particularly in the context of mathematics teaching (e.g., Ball, Lubienski, & Mewborn, 2001). However, despite the eminent role that is attributed to teachers’ professional knowledge for creating powerful learning environments, today only very few instruments are available to tap teachers’ knowledge directly (Baumert, Blum & Neubrand, 2004). As a consequence, many questions on mathematics teachers’ knowledge, i.e., on its content, its structure, or on the way how it influences teaching and learning, are still empirically unanswered. One of the aims of the COACTIV Project (Cognitive Activation in the Classroom) was to conceptualise the professional knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers and to construct reliable tests accordingly. COACTIV, which was funded by the German research foundation (DFG) from 2002-2006 (Project directors: Jurgen Baumert, Berlin; Werner Blum, Kassel; Michael Neubrand, Oldenburg), investigated the mathematics teachers of the German PISA classes 2003 and 2004. Besides knowledge tests, in COACTIV a broad battery of instruments was newly developed (or adapted) that tapped, among other things, teachers’ biographical background, motivational orientations, professional beliefs and self regulation (Fig. 1; for an overview on the instruments see, e.g., Krauss et al., 2004). As it becomes clear from Figure 1, the close relationship between COACTIV and PISA allows, for the first time in Germany, a combined analysis of large data sets on teachers and their lessons (COACTIV) as well as on their students (PISA; see Prenzel et al., 2004) in a common technical and conceptual framework (for an overview on results of COACTIV see, in particular, Kunter et al., in press, or Brunner et al., 2006a).