Validity of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence and other very short forms of estimating intellectual functioning
Validity of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence and other very short forms of estimating intellectual functioning
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1073191102009001003
复制
发表时间：
2002-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Axelrod, BN
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Axelrod, BN
在72名参与者的混合临床样本中，将韦氏成人智力量表III(WAIS-III)的表现与韦克斯勒简明智力量表(WASI)的表现进行比较，以及对WAIS-III表现得出的智力功能的简明形式估计。是不是言语智商(VIQ)得分显著高于？WAIS-III的VIQ，而绩效智商(PIQ)估计与实际的WAIS-III PIQ和满分IQ(FSIQ)都不同。WAIS-III得分与WASI得分的相关性始终低于WASI-III与所有其他简短形式之间的相关。尽管WASI维持了两分测验FSIQ的15分钟和四分测验FSIQ的30分钟的管理时间，但在预测从WAIS-III获得的分数方面，WASI并没有始终如一地表现出理想的准确性。结果表明，临床医生应该谨慎使用WASI，如果有的话，特别是当需要准确估计个人的WAIS-III结果时。
Performance on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-III) it-as compared to performance on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI), as well as short form estimations of intellectual functioning derived frown WAIS-III performance, in a mixed clinical sample of 72 participants. The WASI verbal IQ (VIQ) score was significantly higher that? the WAIS-III VIQ, whereas performance IQ (PIQ) estimates all differed tom actual WAIS-III PIQ and full scale IQ (FSIQ). Correlations of WAIS-III scores with WASI scores were consistently lower than were correlations between the WASI-III and all other short forms. Although maintaining administration times of 15 minutes for a two-subtest FSIQ and 30 minutes for a four-subtest FSIQ, the WASI did not consistently demonstrate desirable accuracy in predicting scores obtained from the WAIS-III. The results suggest that clinicians should use the WASI cautiously, if at all, especially,when accurate estimates of individuals 'WAIS-III results are needed.