Public Need versus Private Interest: The Case of the Hurlingham Club, 1945–1948
Public Need versus Private Interest: The Case of the Hurlingham Club, 1945–1948
复制标题
公共需求与私人利益：赫林厄姆俱乐部案例，1945-1948
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
N. Baker
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Baker
摘要 作为马球精英运动的管理机构，赫林汉姆俱乐部 (Hurlingham Club) 在第二次世界大战后受到威胁，失去了位于富勒姆都会区的全部 75 英亩土地。经过与伦敦郡议会的长期谈判以及城乡规划部进行的公开调查后，俱乐部失去了两个马球场，改建为住房和一个公园。然而，直到今天，它仍然保留了剩余的 40 英亩土地。本文试图解释这个精英机构在政治和社会平等主义享有广泛影响力的时代的生存。
Abstract The Hurlingham Club, the governing body of the elite sport of polo, was threatened after World War II with the loss of all 75 acres of its property in the Metropolitan Borough of Fulham. After protracted negotiations with the London County Council and a public inquiry conducted by the Ministry of Town and Country Planning, the club lost its two polo fields to housing and a public park. However, it retained, as it does to this day, the remaining 40 acres of its land. This paper seeks to explain the survival of this elite institution at a time when political and social egalitarianism enjoyed sweeping influence.