Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall.
Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall.
复制标题
自由回忆中的情境变异性和序列位置效应。
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.25.4.923
复制
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kahana,MJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Howard,MW;Kahana,MJ
在立即自由回忆中，连续回忆的单词往往来自附近的序列位置。MJ Kahana（参见记录1996-93836-009）记录了这种效应，并表明这种趋势（作者称之为滞后近因效应）可以通过联想记忆搜索（SAM）模型的变体（JGW Raaijmakers和RM Shiffrin，1980，1981）很好地描述。在2个实验中，参与者进行即时，延迟，和连续无干扰回忆的条件下，旨在尽量减少排练。滞后近因效应，以前观察到的立即自由回忆，也观察到延迟和连续分心物自由回忆。虽然两个存储的记忆模型，如SAM，很容易解释列表的末尾近因效应在即时自由回忆，其衰减在延迟自由回忆，这些模型未能解释长期的近因效应。通过分析模拟，作者表明，在所有干扰条件下，列表近因效应和滞后近因效应的结束，可以解释一个单一的存储模型，在该模型中，与每个被召回的项目检索的上下文，作为后续召回的线索。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
In immediate free recall, words recalled successively tend to come from nearby serial positions. MJ Kahana (see record 1996-93836-009) documented this effect and showed that this tendency, which the authors refer to as the lag recency effect, is well described by a variant of the search of associative memory (SAM) model (JGW Raaijmakers & RM Shiffrin, 1980, 1981). In 2 experiments, participants performed immediate, delayed, and continuous distractor free recall under conditions designed to minimize rehearsal. The lag recency effect, previously observed in immediate free recall, was also observed in delayed and continuous distractor free recall. Although two-store memory models, such as SAM, readily account for the end-of-list recency effect in immediate free recall, and its attenuation in delayed free recall, these models fail to account for the long-term recency effect. By means of analytic simulations, the authors show that both the end of list recency effect and the lag recency effect, across all distractor conditions, can be explained by a single-store model in which context, retrieved with each recalled item, serves as a cue for subsequent recalls.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)