Laboratory Assessment of Glucose Meters Does Not Predict Reliability of Clinical Performance
Laboratory Assessment of Glucose Meters Does Not Predict Reliability of Clinical Performance
复制标题
血糖仪的实验室评估并不能预测临床表现的可靠性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1994
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Mooradian
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Bernbaum;S. Albert;J. McGinnis;S. Brusca;Deborah Miller;Joseph W. Hoffmann;F. Kaiser;A. Mooradian
作者评价了5种血糖仪的准确度、精密度、临床可靠性和患者感知的易用性。三个血糖仪产生的值在准确度和精密度的可接受范围内。血糖仪的临床可靠性由患者试验确定。25例受试者进行了血糖自我监测。只有两种血糖仪-One Touch II和AccuChek III -在可接受范围内（实验室值的15%以内）证明了临床可靠性。Companion-2是最容易使用的血糖仪，在不到50%的时间内表现出可接受的临床可靠性。血糖仪的实验室评估应辅以实际患者试验。
The authors evaluated five glucose meters for accuracy, precision, clinical reliability, and patient perceived ease of use. Three meters produced values within the acceptable range for accuracy and precision. The clinical reliability of the meters was determined by patient trials. Twenty-five subjects performed selfmonitoring of blood glucose. Only two meters—the One Touch II and AccuChek III —demonstrated clinical reliability in the acceptable range (within 15% of laboratory values). The Companion-2, the meter rated easiest to use, demonstrated acceptable clinical reliability less than 50% of the time. Laboratory assessments of glucose meters should be supplemented by practical patient trials.