THE RISE AND DECLINE OF URBAN APARTHEID IN SOUTH-AFRICA
THE RISE AND DECLINE OF URBAN APARTHEID IN SOUTH-AFRICA
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/oxfordjournals.afraf.a098280
复制
发表时间:
1990-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
MAYLAM, P
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
MAYLAM, P
IN DECEMBER 1919 a deputation, representing the residents of Ndabeni, an African township in Cape Town, met the Minister of Native Affairs to discuss the future of the township. The residents of Ndabeni faced the prospect of relocation to a new township. A spokesperson for the delegation, expressing dismay at the impending move, told the minister that it appeared that Africans were not wanted in Cape Town: that only their hands were needed at work, and that if some mysterious arrangement could be devised whereby only their hands could be daily brought to town for purposes of labour and their persons and faces not seen at all, that would perhaps suit their white masters better. 1This spokesperson, unnamed and forgotten, was touching upon both the essential objective and the fundamental contradiction of urban segregation and apartheid. Much of state urban policy in South Africa has been directed towards attaining the unattainable: the securing of labour-power without labourers. Out of this fundamental contradiction has arisen many further contradictions, conflicts and struggles. It is the aim of this article to show how the policy and practice of urban segregation, control and apartheid have evolved (insofar as those policies and practices have affected Africans), and to examine how the system has begun to show signs of collapse in more recent years. The first part of the article tries to periodize the evolution of the apartheid city and to explain why and how it emerged in specific forms at certain times. In this section the focus will be on four main centres: Kimberley, Johannesburg, Cape Town and Durban. The second part examines both the primary mechanisms and the contradictions of urban apartheid. It considers how the urban African labour force has been reproduced over time, and who has borne the costs of reproduction. These issues gave rise to considerable debate among state policy makers, and to divisions and conflicts within and between the central state, the local state and capital. Indeed, much of state urban policy over the years has had to be concentrated on managing the contradictions, conflicts and struggles that have developed around urban apartheid. This task of management has been achieved more successfully at certain times