The Evidence of Experience
The Evidence of Experience
复制标题
经验的证据
DOI：
10.1086/448612
复制
发表时间：
1991
期刊：
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
J. Scott
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Scott
我感谢Tom Keenan邀请我参加会议(“今日历史与今夜”，罗格斯和普林斯顿大学，1990年3月)，我在会上尝试了其中的一些想法，并感谢在场的许多人，他们的问题和评论导致了第一轮的修改和重新制定。1990年春天，我在罗格斯大学的研究生研讨会上，学生们对我对“经验”以及它对历史化的意义的概念的澄清起到了不可估量的作用。1990-91年间，在高等研究院社会科学学院举行的“历史”研讨会上，来自成员的批评帮助这篇论文完成了最后的--而且我认为--有了很大的改进。像往常一样，伊丽莎白·威德为这篇论文的概念化提出了至关重要的建议。我也感谢朱迪思·巴特勒、克里斯蒂娜·克罗斯比、尼古拉斯·德克斯、克里斯托弗·芬斯克、克利福德·格尔茨、唐娜·哈拉韦、苏珊·哈丁、吉安·普拉卡什、唐纳德·斯科特和小威廉·休厄尔的重要贡献。凯伦·斯旺精明的评论让我重新思考并重写了这篇论文的最后一部分。我从她和那次练习中学到了很多。在他1987年7月写的一封信中，雷金纳德·泽尔尼克要求我阐明一个可能对历史学家有用的“经验”的定义。虽然我不确定他会不会在这篇文章中找到他想要的答案，但我要感谢他的早期挑衅。1.有关“差异困境”的重要讨论，请参阅玛莎·米诺。《正义产生》，《最高法院，1986年任期》序言，《哈佛法律评论》第101期(1987年11月)：第10-95页。
I am grateful to Tom Keenan for inviting me to the conference ("History Todayand Tonight," Rutgers and Princeton Universities, March 1990) where I tried out some of these ideas, and to the many people there whose questions and comments led to a first round of revisions and reformulations. The students in my graduate seminar at Rutgers in the spring of 1990 helped immeasurably in the clarification of my ideas about "experience" and about what it means to historicize. Criticism from members of the "History" seminar during 1990-91 in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study helped give this paper its final-and, I think, much improved-form. As usual, Elizabeth Weed provided the crucial suggestions for the conceptualization of this paper. I also appreciate the important contributions of Judith Butler, Christina Crosby, Nicholas Dirks, Christopher Fynsk, Clifford Geertz, Donna Haraway, Susan Harding, Gyan Prakash, Donald Scott, and William Sewell, Jr. Karen Swann's astute comments led me to rethink and rewrite the final section of this paper. I learned a great deal from her and from that exercise. In a letter he wrote in July 1987, Reginald Zelnick challenged me to articulate a definition of "experience" that might work for historians. Although I'm not sure he will find this essay the answer he was looking for, I'm indebted to him for that early provocation. 1. For an important discussion of the "dilemma of difference," see Martha Minow. "Justice Engendered," foreword to "The Supreme Court, 1986 Term," Harvard Law Review 101 (Nov. 1987): 10-95.