Assessing individual differences in constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan
Assessing individual differences in constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.780
复制
发表时间：
1996-04-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Gramzow, R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tangney, JP;HillBarlow, D;Gramzow, R
基于情景的自我报告措施被开发出来，以评估人们从童年中期到成年期的典型经历和管理愤怒的方式。儿童、青少年和成人的愤怒反应量表（阿里斯）分别评估（a）愤怒唤起，（B）意图，（c）认知和行为反应，以及（d）长期后果。几项独立研究为阿里斯的可靠性和有效性提供了支持。理论上一致的模式的相关性观察（a）全球自我报告措施的敌意，侵略，愤怒管理策略（成人版）;（B）教师报告的行为和情绪调整（儿童和青少年版本）;（c）自我和家庭成员的行为报告在特定的愤怒事件（青少年和成人版本）。从额外的人格和发展研究的结果进行了总结，进一步支持结构效度。
Scenario-based, self-report measures were developed to assess how people characteristically experience and manage anger from middle childhood through adulthood. The Anger Response Inventories (ARIs) for children, adolescents, and adults each assess (a) anger arousal, (b) intentions, (c) cognitive and behavioral responses, and (d) long-term consequences. Several independent studies provide support for the reliability and validity of the ARIs. Theoretically consistent patterns of correlations were observed with (a) global self-report measures of hostility, aggression, and anger-management strategies (adult version); (b) teacher reports of behavioral and emotional adjustment (child and adolescent versions); and (c) self and family-member reports of behaviors in specific anger episodes (adolescent and adult versions). Findings from additional personality and developmental studies are summarized, further supporting construct validity.