Quality indicators for blogs and podcasts used in medical education: modified Delphi consensus recommendations by an international cohort of health professions educators

Quality indicators for blogs and podcasts used in medical education: modified Delphi consensus recommendations by an international cohort of health professions educators
复制标题

DOI:
10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-133230
复制
发表时间:
2015-10-01
影响因子:
5.1
通讯作者:
Chan, Teresa
Chan, Teresa
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lin, Michelle;Thoma, Brent;Chan, Teresa

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景 对用于教育的社交媒体平台的质量保证担忧已经在医学教育界出现。随着越来越多的学员和临床医生使用博客和播客等资源进行学习,我们的目标是确定这些资源的质量指标。之前的一项研究确定了这些社交媒体资源的 151 个潜在相关质量指标。 目的 使用国际健康专业教育工作者队列来确定博客和播客的质量标记。 方法 在 2014 年国际住院医师教育会议上,由 44 名健康专业教育工作者自选组成的小组参加了社交媒体峰会,期间进行了修改后的德尔菲共识研究,以确定 151 个质量指标中哪些符合先验 >= 90% 的纳入阈值。 结果分为可信度 (n=8)、内容 (n=4) 和设计 (n=1) 领域的 13 个质量指标满足纳入阈值。 结论 确定的质量指标可以作为进一步研究基于社交媒体的医学教育资源质量指标的基础,并促使讨论其作为教育学术形式的合法性。
Background Quality assurance concerns about social media platforms used for education have arisen within the medical education community. As more trainees and clinicians use resources such as blogs and podcasts for learning, we aimed to identify quality indicators for these resources. A previous study identified 151 potentially relevant quality indicators for these social media resources.Objective To identify quality markers for blogs and podcasts using an international cohort of health professions educators.Methods A self-selected group of 44 health professions educators at the 2014 International Conference on Residency Education participated in a Social Media Summit during which a modified Delphi consensus study was conducted to determine which of the 151 quality indicators met the a priori >= 90% inclusion threshold.Results Thirteen quality indicators classified into the domains of credibility (n=8), content (n=4) and design (n=1) met the inclusion threshold.Conclusions The quality indicators that were identified may serve as a foundation for further research on quality indicators of social media-based medical education resources and prompt discussion of their legitimacy as a form of educational scholarship.