Explorations of Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland's (1990) connectionist model of Stroop performance.
Explorations of Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland's (1990) connectionist model of Stroop performance.
复制标题
对科恩、邓巴和麦克莱兰 (1990) 斯特鲁普表演联结主义模型的探索。
DOI：
10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.174
复制
发表时间：
1998
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
Faust,ME
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kanne,SM;Balota,DA;Spieler,DH;Faust,ME
JD Cohen，K. Dunbar和JL McClelland（1990）的Stroop任务绩效模型被用来模拟DH Spieler，DA Balota和ME Faust（1996）的研究数据。结果表明，该模型未能捕捉整体差异时，设置大小增加到超过2个响应选项的单词阅读和颜色命名的词汇。进一步的实证证据表明，增加反应集的大小在Stroop任务的性能的影响是增加整体颜色命名和单词阅读之间的差异，这是在直接相反的科恩等人的架构所产生的下降。尽管Cohen等人的模型提供了意义水平干扰效应的有用描述，但是单词阅读和颜色命名之间的质的差异排除了对每个过程使用相同架构的模型，例如Cohen等人的模型，以完全捕获Stroop任务中的性能。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
The JD Cohen, K. Dunbar, and JL McClelland (1990) model of Stroop task performance is used to model data from a study by DH Spieler, DA Balota, and ME Faust (1996). The results indicate that the model fails to capture overall differences between word reading and color naming latencies when set size is increased beyond 2 response alternatives. Further empirical evidence is presented that suggests that the influence of increasing response set size in Stroop task performance is to increase the difference between overall color naming and word reading, which is in direct opposition to the decrease produced by the Cohen et al architecture. Although the Cohen et al model provides a useful description of meaning-level interference effects, the qualitative differences between word reading and color naming preclude a model that uses identical architectures for each process, such as that of Cohen et al, to fully capture performance in the Stroop task.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)