How are nature based solutions contributing to priority societal challenges surrounding human well-being in the United Kingdom: a systematic map protocol

How are nature based solutions contributing to priority societal challenges surrounding human well-being in the United Kingdom: a systematic map protocol
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/s13750-019-0180-4
复制
发表时间:
2019-11-22
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Quinn, Melina
Quinn, Melina
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dick, Jan;Miller, James D.;Quinn, Melina

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

基于自然的解决方案(NBS)的概念已经发展成为一个包含绿色/蓝色/自然基础设施、生态系统方法、生态系统服务等概念的总括概念,但其核心是,它们集中在学习和利用自然创造可持续的社会生态系统这一总体主题上,从而提高人类福祉(HWB)。国家统计局解决了广泛的空间尺度(地方、区域和全球)和时间尺度(中长期)的社会挑战。虽然有许多评论和明确的证据基础将某些国家统计局与HWB的各种要素联系起来,特别是城市绿地和人类健康,但在一系列栖息地中,国家统计局干预措施与相关的多种积极和消极的HWB结果之间的联系并没有全面的映射。最初的研究阶段使用参与式共同设计过程来选择英国面临的四个优先社会挑战:三个与管理问题有关,即NBS成本效益,规划治理,环境正义,以及对声环境的第四个威胁。这些挑战共同解决了利益相关者要求广泛调查的优先管理问题,即景观、城市景观、海景和声音景观。该研究的结果旨在确定和定义英国科学未来潜在的环境证据挑战。本协议描述了解决研究问题的方法:有什么证据表明基于自然的解决方案及其对人类福祉的影响,以应对与成本效益、规划治理、环境正义和声环境相关的社会挑战?本研究将使用系统的制图方法,寻找并确定旨在评估基于自然的人类福祉解决方案的研究,以应对这四个社会挑战。系统地搜索多个学术/在线数据库,针对一些测试文章进行测试。搜索结果通过三个阶段的过程使用资格标准进行细化:标题、摘要、全文。从筛选研究中提取的数据使用预定义的编码策略。数据中的主要趋势将根据一系列次要问题进行综合,并以图形矩阵形式呈现,说明知识差距和集群,以便研究基于自然的解决方案和针对每个社会挑战的人类福祉。
Background The concept of Nature-based Solutions (NBS) has evolved as an umbrella concept embracing concepts such as Green/Blue/Nature Infrastructure, Ecosystem Approach, Ecosystem Services, but at their core, they cluster into the general theme of learning from and using nature to create sustainable socio-ecological systems, which enhance human well-being (HWB). NBS address societal challenges across a broad range of spatial scales-local, regional and global-and temporal scales-medium to long-term. While there are many reviews and a clear evidence base linking certain NBS to various elements of HWB, particularly urban greenspace and human health, no comprehensive mapping exists of the links between NBS interventions and the associated multiple positive and negative HWB outcomes across a range of habitats. The initial research phase used a participatory co-design process to select four priority societal challenges facing the United Kingdom: three related to management issues i.e. NBS cost-efficacy, governance in planning, environmental justice, and the fourth threats to the acoustic environment. These challenges collectively address priority management issues which stakeholders requested be investigated widely i.e. across landscapes, cityscapes, seascapes and soundscapes. Results of the study are intended to identify and define potential future environmental evidence challenges for UK science. Methods This protocol describes the methodology for approaching the research question: What evidence is there for nature based solutions and their impacts on human wellbeing for societal challenges related to cost-efficacy, governance in planning, environmental justice, and the acoustic environment? Using systematic mapping, this study will search for and identify studies that seek to assess nature-based solutions on human well-being with regard to these four societal challenges. Systematic searches across a number of academic/online databases are tested against a number of test articles. Search results are refined using eligibility criteria through a three stage process: title, abstract, full text. Data from screened studies are extracted using a predefined coding strategy. Key trends in data will be synthesized according to a range of secondary questions and be presented in a graphical matrix illustrating the knowledge gaps and clusters for research into nature-based solutions and human well-being for each societal challenge.