Mutagenic potential of DNA glycation: miscoding by (R)- and (S)-N2-(1-carboxyethyl)-2'-deoxyguanosine.
Mutagenic potential of DNA glycation: miscoding by (R)- and (S)-N2-(1-carboxyethyl)-2'-deoxyguanosine.
复制标题
DNA 糖化的潜在诱变性:(R)- 和 (S)-N2-(1-羧乙基)-2-脱氧鸟苷的错误编码。
DOI:
10.1021/bi901924b
复制
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Termini,John
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wuenschell,GeraldE;Tamae,Daniel;Cercillieux,Angelique;Yamanaka,Rio;Yu,Calvin;Termini,John
Elevated circulating glucose resulting from complications of obesity and metabolic disease can result in the accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) of proteins, lipids, and DNA. The formation of DNA−AGEs assumes particular importance as these adducts may contribute to genetic instability and elevated cancer risk associated with metabolic disease. The principal DNA−AGE,N2-(1-carboxyethyl)-2′-deoxyguanosine (CEdG), is formed as a mixture ofRandSisomers at both the polymer and monomer levels. In order to examine the miscoding potential of this adduct, oligonucleotides substituted with (R)- and (S)-CEdG and the corresponding triphosphates (R)- and (S)-CEdGTP were synthesized, and base-pairing preferences for each stereoisomer were examined using steady-state kinetic approaches. Purine dNTPs were preferentially incorporated opposite template CEdG when either the Klenow (Kf−) orThermus aquaticus(Taq) polymerases were used. The Kf−polymerase preferentially incorporated dGTP, whereas Taq demonstrated a bias for dATP. Kf−incorporated purines opposite theRisomer with greater efficiency, but Taq favored theSisomer. Incorporation of (R)- and (S)-CEdGTP only occurred opposite dC and was catalyzed by Kf−with equal efficiencies. Primer extension from a 3′-terminal CEdG was observed only for theRisomer. These data suggest CEdG is the likely adduct responsible for the observed pattern of G transversions induced by exposure to elevated glucose or its α-oxoaldehyde decomposition product methylglyoxal. The results imply that CEdG within template DNA and the corresponding triphosphate possess differentsyn/anticonformations during replication which influence base-pairing preferences. The implications for CEdG-induced mutagenesisin vivoare discussed.