Influence of verbal instructions on effect-based action control

Influence of verbal instructions on effect-based action control
复制标题

口头指令对基于效果的行动控制的影响

DOI:
10.1007/s00426-016-0745-6
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
Psychological Research
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Dignath
Dignath
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dignath

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

根据表象理论,人们利用动作与其效果之间的双向关联来选择和启动动作。我们的实验研究如何口头指令的行动效果的影响反应选择没有事先的经验,在一个单独的收购阶段的行动效果。针对不同参与者组的指导说明了他们是否应该忽略、注意、学习或故意产生按钮按下产生的声学效果。结果表明,明确的指示的行动效果关系触发效果一致的行动倾向,在第一次审判后的指示,相反,没有证据表明,基于效果的行动控制时,在这些试验中观察到的指示是忽略或出席的行动效果。这些研究结果表明,通过口头指令和直接经验获得的动作效果知识是同样有效的效果为基础的动作控制,只要运动和效果之间的关系是清楚地阐明了在指令。
According to ideomotor theory, people use bidirectional associations between movements and their effects for action selection and initiation. Our experiments examined how verbal instructions of action effects influence response selection without prior experience of action effects in a separate acquisition phase. Instructions for different groups of participants specified whether they should ignore, attend, learn, or intentionally produce acoustic effects produced by button presses. Results showed that explicit instructions of action–effect relations trigger effect-congruent action tendencies in the first trials following the instruction; in contrast, no evidence for effect-based action control was observed in these trials when instructions were to ignore or to attend to the action effects. These findings show that action-effect knowledge acquired through verbal instruction and direct experience is similarly effective for effect-based action control as long as the relation between the movement and the effect is clearly spelled out in the instruction.