Holistic versus analytic process models: a reply.
Holistic versus analytic process models: a reply.
复制标题
整体与分析过程模型：答复。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1979
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. Lockhead
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Lockhead
在对戴克斯和库珀的答复中，考虑了两类刺激过程模型。它表明，分析模型，假设刺激最初处理的组成维度不占大量的已公布的数据。它还表明，整体判别模型，戴克斯和库珀拒绝，但与他们的结果是一致的，并预测所有的数据，他们的分析模型被构建到帐户。
Two classes of stimulus process models are considered in this reply to Dykes and Cooper. It is shown that analytic models which assume that stimuli are initially processed in terms of constituent dimensions do not account for large amounts of published data. It is also shown that the holistic-discriminability model that Dykes and Cooper reject is nonetheless consistent with their results and predicts all of the data for which their analytic model was constructed to account.