Psycholinguistics: Accessing the mental lexicon

Psycholinguistics: Accessing the mental lexicon
复制标题

心理语言学:获取心理词典

DOI:
10.1017/cbo9781139165914.006
复制
发表时间:
1990
影响因子:
9.9
通讯作者:
M. Garman
M. Garman
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Garman

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

预习我们产生和理解的话语在其结构上可以是单词的,也可以是多词的。在这一章中,我们将考虑进入我们的心理词典可能涉及的各种过程,包括单词和多词话语类型,以及在言语和写作以及生产和理解中。在第一节中,我们考虑了什么样的语言形式可以作为词条存储在我们的心理词典(5.1.2)中,并考虑了词汇通达(5.1.3)中的一些一般问题。然后,我们概述了词条可能采取的形式(5.2.1-5.2.2),并回顾了一些关于词汇通达的主要实验结果(5.2.3)。第5.3至5.5节回顾了一些有代表性的词汇通达模型,强调了串行和并行加工类型之间的显著差异。视觉单词识别领域中一个由来已久的问题是单个字母知觉与整体词形知觉在单词识别中的作用;在此背景下,我们考虑了大于单个字母但小于单词的单元的状态(5.6.1)。除了感知和产生的单位外,我们还需要考虑语境在词汇通达中的作用(5.6.2)。我们还回顾了词干和词缀在词汇通达中地位的证据(5.6.3)。最后,得出了一些结论(5.7)。首先,单词单元,然后,我们简短地回到我们的三个参与者对足球的讨论(章节中讨论的段落)。3,摘自Crystal and Davy 1975),我们从B的独白部分开始。
Introduction Preview The utterances that we produce and understand may be either single-word or multi-word in their structure. In this chapter we shall consider the sorts of processes that may be involved in accessing our mental lexicon, in both single- and multi-word utterance types, and both in speech and writing as well as in production and comprehension. In the first section, we consider what sorts of language forms may be stored as entries in our mental lexicon (5.1.2), and consider some general issues in lexical access (5.1.3). We then outline the form that lexical entries may take (5.2.1–5.2.2) and review some of the major experimental findings on lexical access (5.2.3). Sections 5.3 to 5.5 review some representative models of lexical access, highlighting the salient differences between serial and parallel types of processing. One of the longeststanding issues in the field of visual word recognition concerns the role of individual letter perception vs holistic word form perception in word recognition; in this context, we consider the status of units that are both larger than individual letters and smaller than words (5.6.1). Apart from the units of perception and production, we need to consider the role of context in lexical access (5.6.2). We also review the evidence on the status of stems vs affixes in lexical access (5.6.3). Finally, we draw some conclusions (5.7). Word units First, then, we return briefly to our three participants' discussion of football (the passage discussed in ch. 3, from Crystal and Davy 1975), and we pick up the beginning of B's monologue-ish section.