Placemaking and urban gardening: Himmelbeet case study in Berlin
Placemaking and urban gardening: Himmelbeet case study in Berlin
复制标题
场所营造和城市园艺：柏林 Himmelbeet 案例研究
DOI：
10.1108/jpmd-10-2017-0109
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Toni Karge
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Toni Karge
本文旨在从城市规划的角度审视城市社区园林。本文以参与式行动研究为基础，分析了柏林案例研究Himmelbeet及其与关键位置制作概念(Tois，2017)和Madden和Schwartz(1999)的位置制作原则的关系。它考察了作者在柏林志愿工作了几年的一个具体案例。本文运用置地原则集作为事后分析工具，对社区花园是否符合置地标准进行了评价。本文认为，城市社区花园虽然没有置地工具的规划，但也可以看作是置地方案。花园的置地过程展示了挑战公共空间排斥、非投资和非政治化问题的策略，从而例证了公民控制的置地过程的可能性。本文通过评估置地原则和讨论关键置地的标准，将置地与城市社区花园联系起来。本文还有助于更好地理解城市社区花园与当前紧缩趋势和城市不平等的关系。
This paper aims to examine urban community gardens from the urban planning perspective. The paper analyses the Berlin case study Himmelbeet and its relation to the concept of critical placemaking (Toolis, 2017) and placemaking principles of Madden and Schwartz (1999).,The study is based on participatory action research. It examines one specific case study in Berlin where the author volunteered for several years. The set of placemaking principles is used as an ex-post analysis tool to evaluate how the community garden meets the criteria of placemaking.,The paper shows that the urban community garden can be considered as a placemaking scheme although it was not planned with placemaking instruments. The garden’s placemaking process shows strategies to challenge issues of exclusion, disinvestment and depoliticization of public spaces and thus exemplifies the possibilities of citizen-controlled placemaking processes.,The paper links placemaking with urban community gardens by assessing the placemaking principles and discussing the criteria of critical placemaking. The paper also contributes to a better understanding of urban community gardens in relation to current trends of austerity and urban inequalities.
都市农业的批判地理学
影响因子：
7.1
作者：
Tornaghi C
通讯作者：
Tornaghi C