Gentrification, Transit, and Land Use: Moving Beyond Neoclassical Theory
Gentrification, Transit, and Land Use: Moving Beyond Neoclassical Theory
复制标题
绅士化、交通和土地利用：超越新古典理论
DOI：
10.1111/gec3.12203
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
N. Revington
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Revington
尽管关注公共交通服务分配方式的社会公平，但很少有工作考虑交通系统如何通过土地使用变化，特别是中产阶级化影响社会公平。现有的研究交通和土地利用主要是基于新古典主义的城市经济的角度。然而，新古典主义框架在处理社会正义问题（如绅士化进程）方面的能力有限。与此同时，批判性的中产阶级化文献很少考虑交通系统的潜在影响，以改变城市内的可达性利益的分布。有人认为，马克思主义的方法，认为资本和阶级在中产阶级化过程中的作用，提供了一个更好的理解如何过境基础设施的问题，并有助于振兴运输地理。最后，对未来的研究方向提出了建议。
Despite attention to social equity in the way public transit services are distributed, little work has considered how transportation systems may impact social equity through land use changes, particularly gentrification. Existing research on transportation and land use has been grounded primarily in a neoclassical urban economic perspective. However, the neoclassical framework is limited in its ability to handle issues of social justice such as the gentrification process. Meanwhile, critical gentrification literature has seldom considered the potential influence of transport systems to alter the distribution of accessibility benefits within a city. It is argued that a Marxist approach that considers the roles of capital and class in the gentrification process offers a better understanding of how transit infrastructure matters and contributes to a reinvigoration of transport geography. Finally, some directions for future research are suggested.