Comparison of the Community Integration Questionnaire, the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique, and the Disability Rating Scale in traumatic brain injury.
Comparison of the Community Integration Questionnaire, the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique, and the Disability Rating Scale in traumatic brain injury.
复制标题
社区融合问卷、克雷格障碍评估和报告技术以及创伤性脑损伤的残疾评定量表的比较。
DOI：
10.1097/00001199-200212000-00002
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ottenbacher,KennethJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Zhang,Ling;Abreu,BeatrizC;Gonzales,Vera;Seale,Gary;Masel,Brent;Ottenbacher,KennethJ
目的：通过比较社区整合问卷（CIQ）与两种广泛使用且经过充分验证的康复结果测量方法，来检验CIQ在评估创伤性脑损伤（TBI）结果中的同时效度。设计：一项回顾性相关研究，探讨CIQ、克雷格残疾评估和报告技术（CHART）和残疾评定量表（DRS）的同时效度。设置：一家急性期后康复机构。参与者：1996年4月至1998年10月期间入院的70例TBI患者参加了本研究。结果：CIQ和CHART提供的评级在几个方面与DRS提供的评级相似。各量表总分及各分量表之间的差异在0.021 ~ 0.671之间（P<0.05）。01）。CIQ与CHART之间的相关性强于CIQ与DRS之间或CHART与DRS之间，且CHART与DRS之间的相关性强于CIQ与DRS之间。结论：CIQ似乎是在参与（障碍）水平上量化TBI患者康复结局的最合适工具。这项研究的结果可以帮助临床医生更好地了解功能结局指标之间的性质，冗余和差距。监测结果还可以帮助临床医生更好地了解干预措施的有效性。
Objective:To examine the concurrent validity of the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) in assessing outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) by comparing it with two widely used and well-validated measurements of rehabilitation outcome.Design:A retrospective relational study of the concurrent validity of the CIQ, Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART), and Disability Rating Scale (DRS).Setting:A postacute rehabilitation facility.Participants:Seventy patients with a medical diagnosis of TBI admitted between April 1996 and October 1998 participated in the study.Results:CIQ and CHART provide ratings that are similar in several areas to those provided by the DRS. Correlation (r) among total scores and subscales for all three instruments ranged from 0.021 to 0.671 (P<. 01). Correlation between CIQ and CHART is stronger than that between CIQ and DRS or between CHART and DRS, and the correlation between CHART and DRS is stronger than that between CIQ and DRS.Conclusion:The CIQ appears to be the most appropriate instrument in quantifying rehabilitation outcome in patients with TBI at the participatory (handicap) level. The findings of this study can help clinicians gain a greater understanding of the nature, redundancy, and gaps among functional outcome measures. Monitoring outcomes can also help clinicians better understand the effectiveness of interventions.