Consequences, opportunities, and procedures
Consequences, opportunities, and procedures
复制标题
后果、机会和程序
DOI：
10.1007/s003550050129
复制
发表时间：
1999
影响因子：
0.9
通讯作者：
K. Suzumura
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Suzumura
抽象的。本文对支撑传统规范经济学的结果主义进行了反思。它主张应扩大规范经济学的信息基础，以便适当考虑社会选择程序的内在价值及其后果的价值。本文引用了三个例子--蛋糕公平分割问题、竞争在促进经济福利中的作用以及双边贸易限制--以明确指出在作出社会福利判断时程序考虑所提供的服务。帕累托自由意志主义悖论也在包含程序考虑和结果考虑的扩展框架内被重新审视。
Abstract. This paper reflects on consequentialism which underlies the traditional normative economics. It asserts that the informational basis of normative economics should be expanded so that the intrinsic value of social choice procedures should be properly taken into account along with the value of their consequences. Three examples – the problem of fair cake division, the role of competition in the promotion of economic welfare, and bilateral trade restrictions – are invoked to pinpoint the services rendered by procedural considerations in making social welfare judgements. The Pareto libertarian paradox is also re-examined within the extended framework incorporating procedural considerations along with consequential considerations.