Rigged-Election Rhetoric: Coverage and Consequences
Rigged-Election Rhetoric: Coverage and Consequences
复制标题
选举被操纵的言论：范围和后果
DOI：
10.1017/s1049096518001646
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Spencer Goidel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kirby Goidel;Keith J. Gaddie;Spencer Goidel
摘要利用内容分析和原始调查数据，我们调查了唐纳德·特朗普在2016年总统大选期间声称的“操纵选举”的新闻报道和后果。我们补充了以前的文献，表明这种说法的影响是高度依赖于个人的党派关系。共和党人和无党派人士认为选举是通过选民欺诈或媒体偏见操纵的，他们更有可能报告说他们打算投票或已经投票。认为希拉里·克林顿将从选民欺诈或媒体偏见中受益的民主党人和独立人士更有可能投票给唐纳德·特朗普。
ABSTRACT Using content analysis and original survey data, we investigated the news coverage and consequences of Donald Trump’s “rigged-election” claims during the 2016 presidential election. We added to previous literature by showing that the effects of such claims were highly contingent on individual partisan affiliation. Republicans and Independents who believed that the elections were rigged via voter fraud or media bias were more likely to report that they intended to vote or had already voted. Democrats and Independents who believed that Hillary Clinton would benefit from voter fraud or media bias were more likely to vote for Donald Trump.