Making sense of knowledge-brokering organisations: boundary organisations or policy entrepreneurs?
Making sense of knowledge-brokering organisations: boundary organisations or policy entrepreneurs?
复制标题
理解知识经纪组织：边界组织还是政策企业家？
DOI：
10.1093/scipol/scad029
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
MacKillop E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
MacKillop E
知识经纪组织 (KBO) 在全球证据政策格局中成倍增加，改变了决策者获取证据的方式。然而，我们对它们的出现和作用仍然知之甚少。这项研究通过强调他们所做的各种工作、他们与政策制定者建立的关系、他们谈判的复杂知识经纪过程以及他们如何以不同方式建立信誉，有助于了解柯伊伯带天体及其在循证决策中的地位。我们以边界组织理论和政策企业家 (PE) 的概念（源自多流分析）为基础，更好地理解扮演多重角色的 KBO。通过使用私募股权概念，我们更加关注经纪业的政治。这种二元性要求他们寻求提供“客观”证据，同时确定什么可以作为政策证据并为政治决策提出建议。
Knowledge-brokering organisations (KBOs) have multiplied in the evidence–policy landscape worldwide, changing how decision-makers are accessing evidence. Yet, we still know little about their emergence and roles. This research helps to understand KBOs and their place in evidence-based policymaking by highlighting the varied work that they do, the relationships they cultivate with policymakers, the complex knowledge-brokering processes they negotiate, and how they establish their credibility in different ways. We build on boundary organisation theory and the concept of policy entrepreneur (PE) (drawn from the multiple streams analysis) to develop a better understanding of KBOs who play multiple roles. By using the PE concept, we bring a greater focus on the politics of brokering. This duality involves them in seeking to provide ‘objective’ evidence while simultaneously determining what counts as evidence for policy and making recommendations for political decisions.