Measuring group social interactions following acquired brain injury: an inter-rater reliability evaluation
Measuring group social interactions following acquired brain injury: an inter-rater reliability evaluation
复制标题
测量获得性脑损伤后的群体社交互动：评估者间的可靠性评估
DOI：
10.1080/02687038.2020.1836315
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Howell S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Howell S
背景：获得性脑损伤（ABI）后的社会沟通障碍是有充分文献记载的。有证据表明，群体干预是有益的，但研究有效的工具来衡量群体结果是一个新的研究领域。目的本研究报告了用于群体互动数据的三种既定社会交际测量方法的内部信度：交际语用障碍概况（PPIC）、中间社交技能行为参考评分系统（BRISS-R）和会话参与适应性测量（MPC）。本文还对群体互动行为的新型数字化工具——互动网络工具（INT）的内部可靠性进行了评估。方法对31份ABI组相互作用视频样本进行评分，由两对评分者分别采用四种结局指标进行评分。用类内相关性（ICC）计算组间信度。结果计算了不同测量值的icc估计值及其95%置信区间。测量结果显示灵敏度差异。MPC相互作用量表（ICC = 0.77）和交易量表（ICC = 0.74）的一致性为中等至良好。INT启动频率（ICC = 0.83）从中到优，INT响应频率（ICC = 0.69）从差到好。BRISS-R PCSS量表（ICC = 0.49）和PDBS量表（ICC = 0.50）的信度为差至中等，PPIC量表的信度为中等，但存在偏倚。结论参与度测量（MPC和INT）具有可接受的信度。INT作为一种表征互动和检测群体交流行为变化的新方法，显示出了很大的希望。
BackgroundSocial communication impairments following acquired brain injury (ABI) are well-documented. There is evidence that group interventions are beneficial but research into validated instruments to measure group outcomes is a new field of investigation.AimsThis study reports on the inter-rater reliability of three established social communication measures for use with group interaction data: the Profile of Pragmatic Impairment in Communication (PPIC), the Behaviorally Referenced Rating System of Intermediate Social Skills (BRISS-R), the Adapted Measure of Participation in Conversation (MPC). Inter-rater reliability of the Interactional Network Tool (INT), a new digital tool designed for group interactional behaviours, is also evaluated.MethodThirty-one video samples of ABI group interactions were independently rated by two rater pairs using the four outcome measures. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using intra-class correlations (ICC).ResultsICC estimates and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the different measures. The measures showed differential sensitivity. Rater agreement on the MPC interaction (ICC = 0.77) and transaction (ICC = 0.74) scales was moderate to good. The INT initiation frequencies (ICC = 0.83) were moderate to excellent and the INT response frequencies (ICC = 0.69) were poor to good. Poor to moderate reliability was achieved on the BRISS-R PCSS (ICC = 0.49) and PDBS (ICC = 0.50) scale and PPIC findings were moderate but showed presence of skew.ConclusionAcceptable reliability was achieved on two measures of participation (MPC and INT). The INT shows promise as a new method to characterise interactions and detect change in group communication behaviour.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology
影响因子：
--
作者：
Hallgren KA
通讯作者：
Hallgren KA
评估创伤性脑损伤后的社交技能：BRISS 作为临床工具。
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Sharon Flanagan;S. McDonald;L. Togher
通讯作者：
L. Togher
循证临床实践时代衡量结果和监测进展
影响因子：
0.8
作者：
R. Tate
通讯作者：
R. Tate
测量脑外伤患者及其沟通伙伴的社交互动：改编后的卡根量表
影响因子：
2
作者：
L. Togher;E. Power;R. Tate;S. McDonald;Rachel Rietdijk
通讯作者：
Rachel Rietdijk
使用人际过程回忆（IPR）来修复新脑损伤者的人际和沟通技巧缺陷。
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1982
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Dennis Helffenstein;F. Wechsler
通讯作者：
F. Wechsler