What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality
What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.119
复制
发表时间：
2007-01-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Millevoi, Allison
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Biesanz, Jeremy C.;West, Stephen G.;Millevoi, Allison
理论和研究的认识时间和人格判断的共识主要是分别研究人格的每个维度。在洛Cronbach（1955）的术语，这种以特质为中心的方法结合了对人格判断中的高度，差异高度和差异准确性的共识。本文扩展了D. A. Kenny（1991，1994）的加权平均模型（WAM）-影响人格判断一致性的因素的理论模型-分离出Cronbach的两个共识组成部分：刻板印象准确性和差异准确性。与基于WAM的预测一致，随着相识时间的增加，自我-他人协议和共识差异准确性增加，刻板印象准确性下降，特质水平或原始配置文件相关性一般保持不变。讨论的重点是条件下的认识和共识和自我他人之间的人格评价出现的协议和印象如何随着时间的推移而变化的长度之间的关系。
Theory and research examining length of acquaintance and consensus among personality judgments have predominantly examined each dimension of personality separately. In L. J. Cronbach's (1955) terminology, this trait-centered approach combines consensus on elevation, differential elevation, and differential accuracy in personality judgments. The current article extends D. A. Kenny's (1991, 1994) weighted average model (WAM)-a theoretical model of the factors that influence agreement among personality judgments-to separate out two of Cronbach's components of consensus: stereotype accuracy and differential accuracy. Consistent with the predictions based on the WAM, as length of acquaintance increased, self-other agreement and consensus differential accuracy increased, stereotype accuracy decreased, and trait-level or raw profile correlations generally remained unchanged. Discussion focuses on the conditions under which a relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement among personality evaluations emerges and how impressions change over time.