Land financialisation, planning informalisation and gentrification as statecraft in Antwerp

Land financialisation, planning informalisation and gentrification as statecraft in Antwerp
复制标题

土地金融化、规划信息化和高档化作为安特卫普的治国之道

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Callum Ward
Callum Ward
中科院分区:
经济学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Callum Ward

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文通过对城市霸权的解读,深入探讨了国家在土地金融化中的作用。这为在威权主义新自由主义在欧洲崛起的背景下对计划政治进行合流分析提供了基础。我通过安特卫普的案例探讨了这一点,因为它经历了霸权转变,民族主义新自由主义政党新弗拉芒联盟(Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie; N-VA)结束了社会党70年的统治,放松了对城市技术官僚规划体系的管制。然而,这种对自由市场的放任导致了高利润投资产品的诞生,而不是适合中产阶级的住房,这引发了人们对香港“中产阶级化”战略的担忧。因此,城市规划系统的政治化导致了对裙带关系的争议,这可能会破坏北越军更广泛的霸权项目。作为回应,香港寻求推出一套更正式的开发商义务协商体系,从而将交易型、以市场为导向的非正式治理网络嵌入规划体系的中心。这篇文章强调了关于土地金融化的文献是如何在当代新自由主义城市主义的矛盾和治国方术中使用土地价值获取机制的最新趋势的过程中,结合结合分析的。
This article offers insight into the role of the state in land financialisation through a reading of urban hegemony. This offers the basis for a conjunctural analysis of the politics of planning within a context in which authoritarian neoliberalism is ascendant across Europe. I explore this through the case of Antwerp as it underwent a hegemonic shift in which the nationalist neoliberal party the New Flemish Alliance (Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie; N-VA) ended 70 years of Socialist Party rule and deregulated the city’s technocratic planning system. However, this unbridling of the free market has led to the creation of high-margin investment products rather than suitable housing for the middle classes, raising concerns about the city’s gentrification strategy. The consequent, politicisation of the city’s planning system led to controversy over clientelism which threatened to undermine the N-VA’s wider hegemonic project. In response, the city has sought to roll out a more formalised system of negotiated developer obligations, so embedding transactional, market-oriented informal governance networks at the centre of the planning system. This article highlights how the literature on land financialisation may incorporate conjunctural analysis, in the process situating recent trends towards the use of land value capture mechanisms within the contradictions and statecraft of contemporary neoliberal urbanism.
DOI: 10.1177/0038026120906790
发表时间: 2020
期刊: The Sociological Review
影响因子: --
作者:
Cooper A
通讯作者: Cooper A