Comparing the confidence calculation rules for forced-choice recognition memory: A winner-takes-all rule wins
Comparing the confidence calculation rules for forced-choice recognition memory: A winner-takes-all rule wins
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jml.2018.06.001
复制
发表时间:
2018-10-01
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Kawaguchi, Jun
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Miyoshi, Kiyofumi;Kuwahara, Ayumi;Kawaguchi, Jun
Using a new signal-detection-theory-based approach, Experiments 1 and 2 of this study were found to reveal that the internal confidence for two-alternative forced-choice (2-AFC) recognition memory is calculated in a winner takes-all manner. The signal strength for one of a pair of stimuli exclusively determines confidence and the other piece of useful information is discarded. Similar winner-takes-all confidence calculation has been reported in different kinds of visual perception tasks, which, together with the present findings, confirms that it is a domain general metacognitive heuristic. Furthermore, by using a less common 2-AFC recognition memory task to select a new stimulus, Experiment 3 elucidated the underlying mechanism of this confidence calculation heuristic. Previously, it had been assumed that the chosen stimulus's signal strength selectively determines confidence and that the signal strength for the unchosen stimulus is disregarded (heuristic use of response-congruent evidence or post-decisional confirmation bias). However, the present study demonstrates that the strength of a stronger signal selectively determines confidence and that of a weaker signal is disregarded. That is, the winner in signal competition, not response selection, takes all in the construction of confidence.