Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients

Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.radonc.2009.04.014
复制
发表时间:
2009-07-01
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Bourhis, Jean
Bourhis, Jean
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pignon, Jean-Pierre;le Maitre, Aurelie;Bourhis, Jean

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景资料:我们之前的个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析显示,化疗改善了非转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)治愈性治疗患者的生存率,伴随化疗的获益更高。然而,结果的异质性限制了结论,并促使我们通过增加1994年至2000年进行的随机试验在更完整的数据库中证实结果。方法:更新的IPD荟萃分析包括1965年至2000年进行的比较HNSCC患者局部区域治疗与局部区域治疗+化疗的试验。使用按试验分层的对数秩检验比较治疗。结果:24个新的试验,其中大部分是伴随化疗,共87个试验和16,485例患者。死亡风险比为0.88(p < 0.0001),5年时化疗的绝对获益为4.5%,化疗时机(辅助、诱导或伴随)和治疗之间存在显著的相互作用(p < 0.0001)。直接(6项试验)和间接比较均显示,与诱导化疗相比,伴随化疗的获益更显著。对于50项伴随试验,风险比为0.81(p < 0.0001),5年时的绝对获益为6.5%。随着年龄的增长,化疗的效果逐渐降低(p = 0.003,趋势检验)。结论:证实了伴随化疗的益处,并且其益处大于诱导化疗的益处。(C)2009爱思唯尔爱尔兰有限公司保留所有权利。放射治疗与肿瘤学92(2009)4-14
Background: Our previous individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis showed that chemotherapy improved survival in patients curatively treated for non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), with a higher benefit with concomitant chemotherapy. However the heterogeneity of the results limited the conclusions and prompted us to confirm the results on a more complete database by adding the randomised trials conducted between 1994 and 2000.Methods: The updated IPD meta-analysis included trials comparing loco-regional treatment to loco-regional treatment + chemotherapy in HNSCC patients and conducted between 1965 and 2000. The log-rank-test, stratified by trial, was used to compare treatments. The hazard ratios of death were calculated.Results: Twenty-four new trials, most of them of concomitant chemotherapy, were included with a total of 87 trials and 16,485 patients. The hazard ratio of death was 0.88 (p < 0.0001) with an absolute benefit for chemotherapy of 4.5% at 5 years, and a significant interaction (p < 0.0001) between chemotherapy timing (adjuvant, induction or concomitant) and treatment. Both direct (6 trials) and indirect comparisons showed a more pronounced benefit of the concomitant chemotherapy as compared to induction chemotherapy. For the 50 concomitant trials, the hazard ratio was 0.81 (p < 0.0001) and the absolute benefit 6.5% at 5 years. There was a decreasing effect of chemotherapy with age (p = 0.003, test for trend).Conclusion: The benefit of concomitant chemotherapy was confirmed and was greater than the benefit of induction chemotherapy. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 92 (2009) 4-14