Energy abatement in Chinese industry: Cost evaluation of regulation strategies and allocation alternatives
Energy abatement in Chinese industry: Cost evaluation of regulation strategies and allocation alternatives
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.055
复制
发表时间：
2012-06-01
期刊：
影响因子：
9
通讯作者：
Chen, G. Q.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Xia, X. H.;Chen, G. Q.
针对我国工业，采用方向距离函数法对不同节能减排方案的成本进行了评估。这些情景是基于监管战略和配置选择的组合，前者是部门和省份，后者包括平均、强度份额、绝对份额、歧视性绝对和歧视性强度五项原则。对于所有情景，都计算并比较了产出潜在损失方面的定量影响。由于所有配置方案的产出潜在损失都较小，因此行业调控策略比省域调控策略更有效。研究还表明，在考虑的所有情景中，基于强度分担原则的部门管制和基于绝对分担原则的省级管制是两种最优方案。根据模拟情景对中国十一五和十二五规划的节能分配绩效进行了评估。(C)2012爱思唯尔有限公司。保留所有权利。
For Chinese industry, the costs of different energy consumption abatement scenarios are evaluated by the method of directional distance function. These scenarios are based on the combinations of regulation strategies and allocation alternatives the former are sectors and provinces, and the latter include the five principles of average, intensity share, absolute share, discriminatory absolute and discriminatory intensity. For all the scenarios, the quantitative impacts in terms of output potential loss are calculated and compared. Due to less output potential loss for all the allocation alternatives, the sector regulation strategy is shown to be more effective than the province regulation strategy. It is also demonstrated that, among all the scenarios considered, the sector regulation based on the intensity share principle and the province regulation based on the absolute share principle are the two optimal. The performances of energy abatement allocation of the 11th and 12th Five Year Plans of China are assessed against the simulated scenarios. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.