Beauty May Differ in Each Half of the Eye of the Beholder
Beauty May Differ in Each Half of the Eye of the Beholder
复制标题
观看者的每一半眼的美丽可能有所不同
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1988
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Landis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Regard;T. Landis
我们认为或应该认为什么是美学的看法取决于时代精神。因此，在认知心理学复兴之前，美学并不是神经心理学的一个问题，这导致了一个更动态的大脑功能概念。此外，对审美经验的解释取决于哲学对身心的看法，即，这取决于一个人是否捍卫一个整体的概念，或者认为身体和心理过程是独立的实体。尽管对美的看法不断变化，但我们相信，关于审美知觉与半球处理的规则是可以研究的。从感觉到知觉再到认知的心理过程的纯粹层次观，并不能为研究审美偏好的潜在半球机制提供合适的框架。不那么等级化的观点允许重新引入两种经典的、似乎相互矛盾的判断美的方法：客观方法，即，认为美是客观事物固有的观念，或认为美存在于观看者眼中的主观方法。
The perception of what we regard or ought to regard as aesthetic depends on the Zeitgeist. Aesthetics was, thus, not an issue in neuropsychology until cognitive psychology revived, leading to a more dynamic conception of brain function. Moreover, interpretations of the aesthetic experience depend on the philosophical viewpoint towards mind and body, i.e., on whether one defends a holistic concept or considers physical and mental processes to be separate entities. Despite changing views on beauty, we believe that rules regarding aesthetic perception in relation to hemispheric processing can be investigated. A purely hierarchical view of mental processes from sensation to perception to cognition does not provide a suitable framework for investigating the underlying hemispheric mechanisms of aesthetic preference. Less hierarchical views permit the reintroduction of two classical, seemingly contradictory approaches to the judgement of beauty: the objective approach, i.e., the notion that beauty is inherent to the object or the subjective approach, which claims that beauty lies in the eye of the beholder.