African authorship on African papers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
African authorship on African papers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004612
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
影响因子:
8.1
通讯作者:
Wallis LA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Naidoo AV;Hodkinson P;Lai King L;Wallis LA
With no known cure or vaccine, sharing of information and experiences in real-time became imperative to improving the standard of medical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cases rapidly surged worldwide, and so too did medical publications. 1 The international media and scientific community reported grave concerns about the capacity of fragile, overburdened healthcare systems as cases began to rise in low-resource settings (LRS), such as those in Africa. 2 3 African voices and research are needed to guide the local pandemic response. But, historically, African authors have been underrepresented in medical literature related to the burden of disease on their continent 4–6; it may well be the case that the same has happened during the COVID-19 pandemic. 7 We aimed to investigate the representation of African authors publishing research and commenting on COVID-19 in Africa. A systematic search was conducted using MeSH (medical search heading) terms and other keywords to identify articles about COVID-19 indexed in PubMed between 1 January 2020 and 30 September 2020. While we followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology, only articles published in the top five medical general medical and top five global health journals, as ranked by impact factors, were included. Articles that were duplicates, not from the selected journals or outside the specified time period were removed. Remaining articles were screened at the title, abstract and fulltext level by two authors to ensure content was related to COVID-19. A third author resolved any disagreements regarding inclusion. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the number of articles containing content explicitly related to Africa or any African country, and the number of articles and authors with African primary affiliations represented in the sample. While we recognise that authors may self-identify in various ways, we chose primary listed affiliation as a consistent and easy to identify indicator. A total of 2196 articles related to COVID-19 were included in this review (table 1A, figure 1), with 9222 authors listed across them (table 1B). Of these, just 94 articles (4.3%) contained content related to Africa or a specific African country, and there were 292 (3.2%) authors indicating an African primary affiliation. The mean number of authors per article was 4.2 overall, with a mean 0.13 (3.1%) of these authors being African. Given that high-income countries have been found to have upwards of 40 times the number of health researchers than in low-income countries 8—many of which are on the African continent—it is unsurprising that African contributions to the global body of evidence during the pandemic remain low. Across articles with African content, there were 619 authors; only 210 (33.9%) of these authors had an African affiliation. There were
影响因子:
7.7
作者:
Kelaher, Margaret;Ng, Lye;Rahadi, Arie
通讯作者:
Rahadi, Arie